Leaf Area
(dm²)
Table 4 shows that hybrid h1 outperformed h2 in leaf
area, producing the highest mean value of 103.01 dm², while h2 had the lowest
mean of 97.98 dm². These results are consistent with Abbas (2022).
Regarding organic and biofertilization, treatment B3
(20 t ha⁻¹ + fungal and bacterial inoculation) resulted in the highest leaf
area mean (106.63 dm²), whereas B0 (0 t ha⁻¹ + no biofertilizer) recorded the
lowest mean (92.07 dm²), aligning with the findings of Al-Bermani (2017).
For zeolite, the highest leaf area was observed with
Z3 (24 t ha⁻¹), averaging 108.43 dm², while the control Z0 (0 t ha⁻¹) gave the
lowest mean of 89.73 dm².
Two-way interactions showed that:
Cultivar × Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 gave the
highest leaf area (109.06 dm²), while h2 × B0 had the lowest (89.44 dm²).
Cultivar × Zeolite: h1 × Z3 produced the highest mean
(110.83 dm²), whereas h1 × Z0 had the lowest (87.60 dm²).
Zeolite × Organic–Bio fertilizer: Z3 × B3 resulted in
the highest leaf area (113.17 dm²), and Z0 × B0 gave the lowest (77.32 dm²).
The three-way interaction among cultivar, zeolite, and
organic–bio fertilizer showed that h1 × Z3 × B3 had the highest leaf area
(115.57 dm²), while h1 × Z0 × B0 recorded the lowest (74.82 dm²).
The superiority of hybrid H1 can be attributed to its
specific genetic makeup, which influences physiological and biological
activity, including water and nutrient uptake, resulting in greater leaf area
than other hybrids.
Zeolite enhances leaf area due to its high porosity
and crystalline structure, which allow cation exchange, improve nutrient
retention, mitigate soil toxins and pesticide residues, reduce the uptake of
radioactive elements, and store water in its pores, benefiting plants under
limited water conditions.
Organic and biofertilizers also positively affected
leaf area. Biofertilizers introduce microorganisms that release plant
growth-promoting substances, including hormones, and fix atmospheric nitrogen
in a form accessible to plants (nitrate and nitrite). Organic fertilizers,
especially cow manure, release organic acids that solubilize phosphate rocks,
increasing phosphorus availability and promoting vegetative growth,
particularly leaf area (Salman, 2018).
Table 4. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite
on leaf area of two broccoli hybrids (dm²)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
79.76
|
90.40
|
102.45
|
106.22
|
94.70
|
|
B1
|
93.32
|
105.64
|
108.52
|
111.71
|
103.79
|
|
B2
|
94.62
|
102.87
|
106.72
|
109.82
|
106.50
|
|
B3
|
99.73
|
107.29
|
113.66
|
115.57
|
109.06
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
74.88
|
85.68
|
94.33
|
102.87
|
89.44
|
|
B1
|
98.82
|
100.96
|
104.75
|
106.82
|
101.33
|
|
B2
|
86.81
|
96.40
|
100.98
|
103.70
|
96.97
|
|
B3
|
95.92
|
103.69
|
106.42
|
110.77
|
104.20
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.88
|
0.941
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
Mean
|
|
H1
|
91.85
|
101.55
|
107.83
|
110.83
|
103.01
|
|
H2
|
87.60
|
96.68
|
101.62
|
106.04
|
97.98
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.941
|
0.470
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
Mean
|
|
B0
|
77.32
|
88.04
|
98.39
|
104.54
|
92.07
|
|
B1
|
93.07
|
103.30
|
106.63
|
109.26
|
103.06
|
|
B2
|
90.71
|
99.63
|
103.85
|
106.76
|
100.23
|
|
B3
|
97.82
|
105.49
|
110.04
|
113.17
|
106.63
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.331
|
0.665
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
89.73
|
99.11
|
104.72
|
108.43
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.665
|
Number of Leaves per Plant
Table
5 shows that hybrid h1 exceeded h2 in the number of leaves per plant, producing
the highest mean of 21.92 leaves per plant, while h2 had the lowest mean of
20.83 leaves per plant. These results are consistent with those of Al-Sukmani
(2020).
Regarding
organic–bio fertilization, treatment B3 (20 t ha⁻¹ + fungal and bacterial
inoculation) produced the highest leaf number (22.14 leaves per plant), while
the control B0 (0 t ha⁻¹ + no biofertilizer) had the lowest (20.23 leaves per
plant), consistent with Al-Azzawi (2020).
In
the case of the zeolite, Z3 (24 t ha -1) had the greatest number of leaves
produced at 22.14 on average per plant, with the control Z0 providing 20.23 per
plant, which is consistent with Al-Aradi (2021).
Bidirectional
interactions indicated that:
Cultivar
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 registered the best mean (22.41 leaves per
plant), and h2 × B0 was the lowest (19.32 leaves per plant).
Cultivar
× Zeolite: The mean of the h1 × Z3 was the highest (22.51 leaves per plant),
and the h2 × Z0 was the lowest (19.91 leaves per plant).
Zeolite
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: Z3 × B3 had the highest number of leaves (22.69
leaves per plant), and Z0 × B0 had the lowest number (19.15 leaves per plant).
The
three-way interaction between cultivar, zeolite, and organic- bio fertilizer
revealed that h1× Z3× B3 had the highest mean number of leaves (22.88 leaves
per plant), whereas h2× Z0× B0 had the least number of leaves (18.20 leaves per
plant).
Explanation:
The
h1 is superior in terms of genetic composition, which has some influence on
physiological and biological functions, including nutrient absorption,
transpiration, photosynthesis, and growth, that cause an increase in the number
of leaves.
Zeolite
improves the vegetative growth because of its high porosity, cation exchange
capacity, and water retention and capability to immobilize soil toxins,
pesticides, and pathogens, thus increasing development on the leaf.
The
effect of organic and biofertilizers was also positive on the number of leaves.
Organic fertilizer provides the necessary nutrients and improves water
retention in the soil, whereas biofertilizers add beneficial microorganisms to
improve soil quality, promote root growth, and release growth-promoting agents,
resulting in leaf production.
Table
5. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite on leaf number per plant of
two broccoli hybrids (leaves plant⁻¹)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
20.10
|
20.77
|
21.62
|
22.10
|
21.14
|
|
B1
|
21.80
|
22.31
|
22.47
|
22.69
|
22.31
|
|
B2
|
20.92
|
21.82
|
22.20
|
22.39
|
21.83
|
|
B3
|
21.62
|
22.50
|
22.67
|
22.88
|
22.41
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
18.20
|
18.90
|
19.37
|
20.84
|
19.32
|
|
B1
|
20.93
|
21.57
|
21.91
|
22.09
|
21.62
|
|
B2
|
19.41
|
20.17
|
20.87
|
21.67
|
20.53
|
|
B3
|
21.13
|
21.89
|
22.00
|
22.50
|
21.88
|
|
LSD0.05
|
2.129
|
1.064
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
21.11
|
21.85
|
22.24
|
22.51
|
21.92
|
|
H2
|
19.91
|
20.63
|
21.03
|
21.27
|
20.83
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.064
|
0.532
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
19.15
|
19.83
|
20.49
|
21.47
|
20.23
|
|
B1
|
21.36
|
21.94
|
22.19
|
22.39
|
21.97
|
|
B2
|
20.16
|
20.99
|
21.53
|
22.03
|
21.17
|
|
B3
|
21.37
|
22.19
|
22.33
|
22.69
|
22.14
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.505
|
0.753
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
20.51
|
21.24
|
21.64
|
22.14
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
|
Main Head Diameter (cm)
Table
6 indicates that hybrid h1 was the best among h2, and it gave the highest mean
head diameter of 16.30 cm, and the lowest of 14.75 cm at h2. The difference is
an 8.95 percentage-point benefit for h1, which is consistent with the results
of Saloon et al. (2019), Mohamed (2020), and Al-Khikani (2022).
In terms of the organic- bio fertilization, the B3
level (20 t ha -1 + fungal and bacterial inoculation) gave the largest mean
head diameter (17.61 cm), and B0 level (0 t ha -1 + no biofertilizer) gave the
smallest mean head diameter (13.95 cm); the difference between the two levels
was 20.78%. These findings are consistent with Al-Asadi (2018) and Al-Khikani
(2022).
In
the case of Zeolite, the maximum mean head diameter was recorded in Z3 (24 t ha
-1), with the average of the diameter being 17.32 cm, and in the case of the
control Z0, the average was 13.91 cm, which is an increase of 19.68 percent.
This aligns with Al-Fatlawi (2023).
Two-way
interactions showed that:
Cultivar
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B2 had the highest mean (18.84 cm), while h2 ×
B0 recorded the lowest (13.71 cm).
Cultivar
× Zeolite: h1 × Z3 produced the highest mean (18.23 cm), whereas h2 × Z0 had
the lowest (13.41 cm).
Organic–Bio
fertilizer × Zeolite: B3 × Z3 gave the highest mean (20.42 cm), and B0 × Z0 the
lowest (12.98 cm), representing a 36.43% increase.
It
was observed that the three-way interaction of cultivar, zeolite, and
organic-bio fertilizer which is h1 x B3 x Z3, recorded the largest head
diameter (21.22 cm), and the one with the lowest (12.87 cm), a 39.34% increase
in the first combination.
Explanation:
The
variation of hybrids is based on their different genetic composition, which has
an effect on physiological characteristics like photosynthesis, transpiration,
and evapotranspiration, which further impacts vegetative and reproductive
development, like head diameter.
Organic
manure provides important nutrients, such as nitrogen, which improves
vegetative growth. The growth of more vegetation gives more assimilates to the
growing head. Biofertilizers contain microorganisms that fix atmospheric
nitrogen in a form available to the plant, which contributes to further growth
of the vegetation and reproductive structures.
As
a mineral of nature, zeolite is a negative mineral (AlO4-)
that positively influences soil characteristics, retains water, binds toxic
substances, and alleviates the stress of the environment, which contributes to
better plant growth and the development of heads (Wallace, 2020).
Table
6. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite on the main head diameter of
two broccoli hybrids (cm)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
13.10
|
13.74
|
14.66
|
15.25
|
14.18
|
|
B1
|
14.83
|
15.90
|
17.33
|
18.81
|
10.71
|
|
B2
|
13.89
|
14.36
|
15.90
|
17.76
|
15.45
|
|
B3
|
15.80
|
17.57
|
19.35
|
21.22
|
18.48
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
12.87
|
13.21
|
13.88
|
14.91
|
13.71
|
|
B1
|
13.37
|
13.89
|
14.79
|
15.89
|
14.48
|
|
B2
|
13.10
|
13.68
|
14.22
|
15.09
|
14.02
|
|
B3
|
14.28
|
15.80
|
17.32
|
19.74
|
16.78
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.599
|
0.800
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
14.40
|
15.39
|
16.81
|
18.23
|
16.20
|
|
H2
|
13.41
|
14.14
|
15.05
|
16.40
|
14.75
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.800
|
0.400
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
12.98
|
13.47
|
14.27
|
15.08
|
13.95
|
|
B1
|
14.10
|
14.89
|
16.06
|
17.35
|
15.60
|
|
B2
|
13.49
|
14.02
|
15.06
|
16.38
|
14.73
|
|
B3
|
15.04
|
16.68
|
18.33
|
20.42
|
17.61
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.131
|
0.565
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
13.91
|
14.76
|
15.93
|
17.32
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.566
|
Number of Heads per Plant (heads plant⁻¹)
Table
7 reveals that hybrid h1 was better than h2, with h1 giving a higher mean
number of heads per plant (5.83), whereas h2 gave a lower mean (4.99), and this
is a 14.40 increase in the case of h1. These findings are consistent with those
of Ramadan (2015) and Al-Salhi (2019).
As
far as organic-bio fertilization is concerned, treatment B3 (20 t ha -1 +
fungal and bacterial inoculation) produced the highest mean number of heads
(6.19), and the control B0 produced the lowest (4.32), which also corresponds
to Al-Shammari et al. (2019).
In
the case of zeolite, the maximum mean was obtained with Z3 (24 t ha -1), which
gave 6.18 heads per plant, and the control Z0 gave 4.38, which is consistent
with Di Giuseppe et al. (2015).
Two-way
interactions showed that:
Cultivar
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 gave the highest mean (6.67), while h2 × B0
recorded the lowest (4.93).
Cultivar
× Zeolite: h1 × Z3 produced the highest mean (6.51), while h2 × Z0 had the
lowest (4.17).
Organic–Bio
fertilizer × Zeolite: B3 × Z3 gave the highest mean (7.39), and B0 × Z0 the
lowest (3.55).
The
three-way interaction among cultivar, zeolite, and organic–bio fertilizer
showed that h1 × B3 × Z3 recorded the highest mean (7.91 heads plant⁻¹), while
h2 × B0 × Z0 had the lowest (3.60).
Explanation:
Hybrid
h1 was better than h2 in terms of the number of heads per plant because of its
better vegetative characteristics that directly affect yield components.
B3
is performing well based on the fact that organic and biofertilizers increase
vegetative growth, thus promoting reproductive growth and heads per plant.
Likewise,
Z3 also stimulated vegetation growth and improved the condition of the soil,
leading to natural enhancement of reproduction characteristics, such as the
number of heads per plant.
Table
7. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite on the number of heads per
plant of two broccoli hybrids
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
3.75
|
4.22
|
4.75
|
5.40
|
4.53
|
|
B1
|
4.91
|
5.33
|
6.17
|
6.83
|
5.81
|
|
B2
|
4.30
|
4.79
|
5.59
|
5.92
|
5.15
|
|
B3
|
5.40
|
6.28
|
7.10
|
7.91
|
6.67
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
3.60
|
3.94
|
4.43
|
4.78
|
4.97
|
|
B1
|
4.60
|
5.07
|
5.93
|
6.42
|
5.50
|
|
B2
|
3.84
|
4.27
|
4.90
|
5.33
|
4.58
|
|
B3
|
4.66
|
5.20
|
6.11
|
6.87
|
5.71
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.155
|
0.078
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
4.59
|
5.15
|
5.90
|
6.51
|
5.83
|
|
H2
|
4.17
|
4.62
|
5.34
|
5.85
|
4.99
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.077
|
0.048
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
3.55
|
4.08
|
4.59
|
5.09
|
4.32
|
|
B1
|
4.75
|
5.20
|
6.05
|
6.62
|
5.65
|
|
B2
|
4.07
|
4.53
|
5.24
|
5.62
|
4.86
|
|
B3
|
5.03
|
4.74
|
6.60
|
7.39
|
6.19
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.109
|
|
0.054
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
4.38
|
4.88
|
5.62
|
6.81
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.548
|
|
Vitamin C Concentration (mg 100 g⁻¹ fresh weight)
Table
8 indicates that hybrid h1 was better than h2 and had the highest mean
concentration of vitamin C (92.29 mg 100 g -1 fresh weight), with h2 having the
lowest (90.66 mg 100 g -1 fresh weight). The findings are in agreement with
Saeed (2016).
In
terms of organic-bio fertilization, treatment B3 had the highest mean (93.56 mg
100 g -1) as compared to the control B0 (89.50 mg 100 g -1) according to
Al-Salman and Ibraheem (2020) because organic fertilizers are known to supply
nitrogen that stimulates secondary metabolism, which is vital in the synthesis
of active compounds.
In
the case of zeolite, Z3 (93.56 mg 100 g-1 ) had the highest level of
vitamin C and Z0 (89.50 mg 100 g-1 ) had the lowest level (Al-Aradi,
2021).
Two-way
interactions indicated that:
Hybrid
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 had the highest mean (94.96 mg 100 g⁻¹),
while h2 × B0 had the lowest (88.90 mg 100 g⁻¹).
Hybrid
× Zeolite: h1 × Z3 gave the highest mean (94.54 mg 100 g⁻¹), while h2 × Z0 had
the lowest (89.40 mg 100 g⁻¹).
Organic–Bio
fertilizer × Zeolite: B3 × Z3 recorded the highest mean (96.54 mg 100 g⁻¹),
whereas B0 × Z0 had the lowest (88.86 mg 100 g⁻¹).
The
three-way interaction among hybrid, organic–bio fertilizer, and zeolite showed
that h1 × B3 × Z3 produced the highest mean vitamin C content (98.51 mg 100
g⁻¹), while h2 × B0 × Z0 recorded the lowest (88.33 mg 100 g⁻¹).
Explanation:
Hybrid
H1 was superior in vegetative properties, and this obviously resulted in high
yield and quality factors such as vitamin C.
Treatments
B3 and Z3 were associated with vegetative growth, nutrient status and metabolic
process, leading to an increase in the vitamin C content in the broccoli heads.
Table 8. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite
on vitamin C concentration in primary broccoli heads (mg 100 g⁻¹ fresh weight)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
89.40
|
89.89
|
90.30
|
90.87
|
90.11
|
|
B1
|
90.23
|
91.29
|
93.47
|
95.39
|
92.59
|
|
B2
|
90.00
|
90.88
|
91.83
|
93.40
|
91.52
|
|
B3
|
91.66
|
93.81
|
95.86
|
98.27
|
94.96
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
88.33
|
88.70
|
89.11
|
89.47
|
88.90
|
|
B1
|
89.82
|
90.41
|
91.27
|
92.81
|
91.05
|
|
B2
|
89.47
|
90.12
|
90.88
|
91.75
|
90.55
|
|
B3
|
90.11
|
91.27
|
92.76
|
94.57
|
92.17
|
|
LSD0.05
|
3.862
|
1.931
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
90.32
|
91.46
|
92.86
|
94.54
|
92.29
|
|
H2
|
89.40
|
90.12
|
91.00
|
92.15
|
90.66
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.931
|
0.965
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
88.86
|
89.29
|
89.70
|
90.17
|
89.50
|
|
B1
|
89.97
|
90.85
|
92.37
|
94.10
|
91.82
|
|
B2
|
89.73
|
90.50
|
91.35
|
92.57
|
91.03
|
|
B3
|
90.88
|
92.54
|
94.31
|
96.54
|
93.56
|
|
LSD0.05
|
2.731
|
1.365
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
89.86
|
90.79
|
91.93
|
93.34
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
1.365
|
|
Protein Content (%)
Table
9 indicates that hybrid h1 has outdone h2 with the highest mean protein content
(3.92%), whereas h2 gave the lowest protein content (3.62%), which is an
improvement of 7.65%. These findings are consistent with those of Saloom et
al., (2019).
In
the case of organic- bio fertilization, treatment B3 recorded the highest mean
(4.07) and the lowest mean (3.46) in the control treatment, B0 with a
percentage of 14.98, in line with Al-Sakmani (2026).
In
the case of zeolite, the treatment Z3 had the highest protein content (4.17%),
with Z0 having the lowest protein content (3.38) (Al-Fatlawi, 2023).
Two-way
interactions:
Hybrid
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 had the highest mean (4.33%), while h2 × B0
recorded the lowest (3.10%), a difference of 28.40%.
Hybrid
× Zeolite: h1 × Z3 showed the highest mean (4.42%), whereas h2 × Z0 had the
lowest (3.31%).
Organic–Bio
fertilizer × Zeolite: B3 × Z3 gave the highest mean (4.58%), while B0 × Z0
recorded the lowest (3.19%), a difference of 30.34%.
The
three-way interaction among hybrid, organic–bio fertilizer, and zeolite
revealed that h1 × B3 × Z3 achieved the highest mean protein content (4.92%),
while h2 × B0 × Z0 recorded the lowest (3.10%), representing an increase of
36.99%.
Explanation:
The trends observed are an indication of the better
vegetative development of h1 (leaf area, number of leaves) and this translates
to high yield components, such as protein content. Organic bio-fertilizers and
zeolite enhanced nutrient availability, metabolic activity, and nitrogen
fixation, further enhancing protein accumulation in the head of broccoli.
Table
9. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite on protein content in broccoli
heads (%)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
3.28
|
3.40
|
3.68
|
3.83
|
3.54
|
|
B1
|
3.50
|
3.74
|
4.22
|
4.63
|
4.02
|
|
B2
|
3.32
|
3.66
|
3.87
|
4.30
|
3.78
|
|
B3
|
3.72
|
4.32
|
4.38
|
4.92
|
4.33
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
3.10
|
3.25
|
3.57
|
3.64
|
3.39
|
|
B1
|
3.40
|
3.62
|
3.79
|
3.93
|
3.68
|
|
B2
|
3.26
|
3.51
|
3.80
|
3.83
|
3.61
|
|
B3
|
3.50
|
3.66
|
3.89
|
4.25
|
3.82
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.0899
|
0.045
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
3.45
|
3.78
|
4.03
|
4.42
|
3.92
|
|
H2
|
3.31
|
3.51
|
3.76
|
3.92
|
3.62
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.045
|
0.022
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
3.19
|
3.32
|
3.62
|
3.73
|
3.46
|
|
B1
|
3.45
|
3.68
|
4.00
|
4.28
|
3.85
|
|
B2
|
3.29
|
3.58
|
3.83
|
4.08
|
3.69
|
|
B3
|
3.61
|
3.99
|
4.13
|
4.58
|
4.07
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.064
|
|
0.032
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
3.38
|
3.64
|
3.89
|
4.17
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
0.032
|
|
Sulforaphane Content (mg kg⁻¹)
Table
10 indicates that hybrid h1 was better than h2 with the highest mean content of
sulforaphane (127.84mg/kg -1) followed by the lowest (116.81mg/kg -1), which is
an 8.62 increase. The findings are consistent with Mahmoud (2020) and Sallom et
al. (2015).
In
terms of the organic-bio fertilization, treatment B3 had the highest mean
(137.36 mg kg -1), and the control B0 had the lowest one (101.75 mg kg -1), in
line with Shafeek et al. (2016).
In
application of zeolite, the treatment Z3 (20 t ha -1) had the highest mean
(137.35 mg kg -1), with Z0 providing the lowest (107.55 mg kg -1), which is
consistent with Cabahilla et al. (2016).
Two-way
interactions:
Hybrid
× Organic–Bio fertilizer: h1 × B3 recorded the highest mean (141.84 mg kg⁻¹),
while h2 × B0 had the lowest (94.69 mg kg⁻¹).
Hybrid
× Zeolite: h1 × Z3 gave the highest mean (143.57 mg kg⁻¹), whereas h2 × Z0
recorded the lowest (101.61 mg kg⁻¹).
Organic–Bio
fertilizer × Zeolite: B3 × Z3 produced the highest mean (153.52 mg kg⁻¹), while
B0 × Z0 had the lowest (90.37 mg kg⁻¹).
The
three-way interaction among hybrid, organic–bio fertilizer, and zeolite
revealed that h1 × B3 × Z3 achieved the highest sulforaphane content (158.44 mg
kg⁻¹), while h2 × B0 × Z0 recorded the lowest (83.81 mg kg⁻¹).
Explanation:
Hybrid
h1 was superior in comparison to h2 because of its particular genetic
composition, which dictates physiological and biochemical processes, nutrient
uptake, photosynthesis, transpiration, and growth. Organic bio fertilizers
enhance soil conditions and increase root growth and nutrient absorption.
Biofertilizers also enhance vegetative development, leading to the accumulation
of primary metabolites, which are precursors of secondary metabolites such as
sulforaphane (Al-Asadi, 2018). Zeolite provides the necessary nutrients (Si,
Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, K, P) in bioavailable form, which affects leaf growth and
sulforaphane accumulation (Goyeneche et al., 2015).
Table
10. Effect of organic–bio fertilizers and zeolite on sulforaphane content in
broccoli heads (mg kg⁻¹)
|
Hybrid
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer
|
Zeolite
|
Mean (Hybrid × Fertilizer)
|
|
Z0
|
Z1
|
Z2
|
Z3
|
|
H1
|
B0
|
94.94
|
98.50
|
117.42
|
122.39
|
108.31
|
|
B1
|
111.27
|
121.31
|
128.66
|
142.82
|
126.01
|
|
B2
|
120.53
|
131.51
|
137.10
|
150.66
|
134.95
|
|
B3
|
126.26
|
134.45
|
145.22
|
158.44
|
141.84
|
|
H2
|
B0
|
83.81
|
90.45
|
101.17
|
103.37
|
99.69
|
|
B1
|
92.24
|
110.82
|
119.60
|
131.42
|
113.53
|
|
B2
|
111.22
|
120.37
|
133.25
|
141.12
|
126.49
|
|
B3
|
119.19
|
127.52
|
135.33
|
148.60
|
132.66
|
|
LSD0.05
|
10.993
|
5.497
|
|
|
Hybrid X Zeolite
|
|
|
H1
|
113.50
|
122.19
|
132.10
|
143.57
|
127.84
|
|
H2
|
101.61
|
112.20
|
122.33
|
131.12
|
116.81
|
|
LSD0.05
|
5.497
|
2.748
|
|
|
Organic–Bio Fertilizer X Zeolite
|
|
|
B0
|
90.37
|
94.46
|
109.29
|
112.88
|
101.75
|
|
B1
|
101.75
|
116.06
|
124.13
|
137.12
|
119.76
|
|
B2
|
115.87
|
125.94
|
135.17
|
145.89
|
130.71
|
|
B3
|
123.22
|
132.48
|
140.24
|
153.52
|
137.36
|
|
LSD0.05
|
7.773
|
3.887
|
|
Average of Zeolite
|
107.55
|
117.23
|
127.21
|
137.35
|
|
|
LSD0.05
|
3.887
|
|