Crops face many environmental challenges, both biotic and abiotic stress, including extreme temperatures, salinity, drought, pest and disease incidence, and nutrient deficiencies that significantly impede the growth and development of crops. Global warming and an increase in population pose a global threat to food security. Due to climate variability, global food production has already decreased (Tito et al., 2018). As a result of global warming, irregular rainfall pattern, high and low temperature stress, drought stress, UV stress, and elevated CO2 levels significantly reduces crop growth and alter their physiology (Madhaiyan et al., 2007a; Jinal et al., 2019; Gopi et al., 2020). Due to the intricate nature of stress tolerance, employing conventional breeding techniques to develop crops with strong stress resistance is impossible. Plants developed sophisticated mechanisms to reduce the impacts to adapt to unfavourable stress conditions. The mechanisms include physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes that help plants maintain cellular homeostasis and ensure survival. In recent years, the usage of plant growth-promoting microorganisms has emerged as a sustainable approach to improve plant productivity and resilience under both normal and stress conditions (Vandenkoornhuyse et al., 2015).
Plants are not a single entity, but a host of diverse groups of microorganisms that provide both beneficial and detrimental effects through a diverse relationship, including commensal, symbiotic, parasitic, and mutualistic relationships that shape the productivity of crops (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2021; Rani et al., 2021). The microorganisms that can promote plant growth is known as Plant Growth Promoting bacteria (PGPBs). Among these PGPBs, Methylorubrum, a genus of pink-pigmented, facultative methylotrophic bacteria, able to colonise the phyllosphere, are commonly known as pink pigmented facultative methylotrophs (PPFMs) (Fig.1). Methylorubrum has gained major attention due to its significant potential in mitigating abiotic stress and improving plant growth. These plant-associated microbes help plants to withstand abiotic stress through several mechanisms, including ACC-deaminase production, phytohormones (auxin, cytokinin) synthesis, and by producing free radical scavenging enzymes (Prittesh et al., 2020). In the face of climate change and increasing abiotic stress, the role of Methylorubrum is crucial in improving plant growth and stress mitigation for sustainable agriculture practices. Due to their versatile capabilities, inoculating Methylorubrum alone or in combination, is a valuable tool to improve plant growth and yield. Maintenance of proper plant–microbiome interactions minimizes the use of hazardous agrochemicals and fosters sustainable agriculture practices (Delmotte et al., 2009).
Figure 1. Phyllospheric Colonisation by Methylorubrum
Taxonomy
In 2018, Green and Ardley divided Methylobacterium into two genera, Methylobacterium and Methylorubrum. Based on phenotypic traits, 16s rRNA, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), 11 species were included in the genus Methylorubrum, including Methylorubrum extorquens, M. aminovorans, M. podarium, M. populi, M. pseudosasae, M. rhodesianum, M. rhodinum, M. salsuginis, M. suomiense, M. thiocyanatum, and M. zatmanii. (Green and Ardley, 2018).
Ecology
Methylorubrum is a genus of facultative methylotrophs with diverse ecological adaptability. They are ubiquitous, thriving in diverse niches, including water, soil, plants, animals and contaminated environments (Madhaiyan et al., 2007b). Their ability to utilize one-carbon compounds as a carbon source helps them to survive in unfavourable conditions. The ability of Methylorubrum to utilize single-carbon compounds like methanol, methylamine, its ecological adaptability, and metabolic versatility make it a valuable component in sustainable agriculture, bioprocessing and pollution abatement (Schauer et al., 2011; Green et al., 1988). It plays a crucial role in the global carbon cycle by recycling single-carbon compounds. Diversity of Methylorubrum in various environments was presented in Table 1 (Danko et al., 2021).
Table 1 Diversity of Methylorubrum in diverse environments
Environment |
Species |
References |
Air |
Methylobacterium extorquens |
(Green and Ardley 2018) |
Soil |
Methylobacterium populi |
(Van Aken et al., 2004) |
Methylobacterium suomiense f20 |
(Doronina et al., 2002), |
|
Methylobacterium pseudosasae |
(Madhaiyan and Poonguzhali 2014) |
|
Plants |
Methylobacterium rhodinum |
(Green and Bousfield, 1983) |
Animals |
Methylobacterium zatmanii |
(Green et al., 1988) |
Contaminated soils |
Methylobacterium suomiense |
(Doronina et al., 2002) |
Methylobacterium thiocyanatum |
(Wood et al., 1998) |
|
Manufactured structures (Buildings, tap water showers) |
Methylobacterium zatmanii |
(Kelley et al., 2004) |
Methylobacterium extorquens |
(Szwetkowski and Falkinham Iii, 2020) |
|
Hydrocarbon-contaminated sites |
Methylobacterium populi |
(Ventorino et al., 2014) |
Methylobacterium thiocyanatum |
(Ventorino et al., 2014) |
|
Outer space |
Methylobacterium extorquens |
(Novikova et al., 2006) |