Madras Agricultural Journal
Loading.. Please wait

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

Research Article | Open Access | Peer Review

Effect of Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Biofertilizer on Yield and Its Components of Some Bread Wheat Cultivars

Abdelaziz Ibrahim Abdelsadek Yahya ORCID iD , El-hussin Ghalab Ahmed ORCID iD , Zainab Ahmed Abbas El-Rashidy ORCID iD
Volume : 113
Issue: September(7-9)
Pages: 74 - 84
Download

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

Abstract


Wheat is the world's most important cereal crop for its many properties and uses of its grain. Egyptian researchers does his best to increase yield via biofertilizers with less amount of mineral fertilizer. Thus, a field experiment was conducted during in 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 growing seasons at Etay elbaroud Agricultural Research Station, Egypt. Using a split-plot design in a randomized complete block design arrangement with three replicates, the main plots contain three treatments of mineral N fertilizer (35, 55 and 75 kg N/fed) and three mix treatments with the same levels of mineral N and biofertilizer and sub plots contain three studied cultivars. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of three nitrogen levels (35, 55, and 75 KgN/fad) and the same levels of mineral nitrogen with a biofertilizer on yield and its components of Sakha 95, Misr4, and Sids 14 wheat cultivars to maximize wheat productivity and minimize environmental pollution. All treatments of mineral N and the mix of mineral and biofertilizer had significant effects on all studied traits in both seasons and overall data. The tallest cultivar was Misr 4 in two seasons under N 75 and N 55 and under the same nitrogen levels and biofertilizer. Sakha 95 had the highest value of number of spikes/m2 for two seasons and overall, in all fertilizer treatments. For number of kernels/spike, overall, Misr 4 had the highest number at three levels of nitrogen and three levels of biofertilizer + mineral nitrogen. The heaviest 1000-kernel weight was Sakha 95 in two seasons and overall Misr 4 at all levels of mineral nitrogen and biofertilizer. For grain yield/fad, the highest weight of GY (Ard/fed) was at the three levels of mineral and biofertilizer in the two seasons, and overall, the cultivar Misr 4 had the highest weight of grain yield.

DOI
Pages
74 - 84
Creative Commons
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Madras Agricultural Students' Union in Madras Agricultural Journal (MAJ). This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited by the user.

Keywords


Bread wheat Nitrogen fertilizer Biofertilizer Cultivars Yield.

Introduction


Wheat is the most important and the most widely grown cereal crop in the world, for its many properties and uses of its grain (Sharma et al., 2023; Liang et al., 2024).  Increasing the grain yield of wheat is an important goal to face the continuous increasing food needs of the Egyptian population. Recently, a great deal of attention has been directed by several investigations to increase wheat production to minimize the gap between Egyptian production and consumption by increasing the cultivated area and wheat productivity per unit area (Zaki et al., 2012).  Overuse of chemical fertilizers has devastating effects on soil fertility. Moreover, even if chemical fertilizers are used in a balanced way, they negatively affect soil health in the long term. Nowadays, scientists are trying to develop an agricultural system that not only reduces the cost of agricultural production but also protects natural resources (Abbas et al., 2012; Darjee et al., 2024). Organic farming is a production system that limits or largely eliminates the use of synthetic or inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, and hormones (Reddy, 2005; Aulakh, 2010). Nitrogen (N) is the most important nutrient supplied to most cereal crops like wheat (Hassan et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017 and El-sorady et al., 2022). The most important role of N in plants is its presence in the structure of proteins and nucleic acids.  N is necessary to achieve high yield potential in crops; N fertilizer is known to affect the number of tillers m2, number of grains /spike, spike length and weight, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield of wheat (Kandil et al., 2011; Campuzano et al., 2012; and Ozkan et al., 2021).  Increasing the role of biofertilizer can reduce the need for chemical fertilizers and decrease adverse environmental effects. They can play a significant role in fixing atmospheric N and production of plant growth promoting substance. Therefore, in the development and implementation of sustainable agricultural techniques, bio-fertilizer has great importance in alleviating environmental pollution. Attia and abd Elsalam (2016) reported that the inoculation with bio- fertilization had a significant effect on plant height, grain weight/spike, number of spikes/m2, number of grains /spike, 1000 grain weight, grain in wheat. Biofertilizers reduce pollution and sustain soil fertility through their effect on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. Kaur et al., 2018; Farid et al., 2023; and Mahmud et al., 2022. Therefore, the investigation aimed to study the effect of mineral N and biofertilizer on yield and yield components of wheat, to improve wheat yield productivity and minimize pollution.


Methodology


The field experiment was conducted at Etay elbaroud Agriculture Research Station of the ARC, Egypt, during the 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 growing seasons. To study the effect of three mineral nitrogen fertilizer levels and a mix between mineral nitrogen and biofertilization (biogen) on yield and yield components of three bread wheat cultivars.

Inoculum treatments:

Wheat grains were inoculated before sowing with free-living Nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Azotobacter) under the commercial name (Biogein) that contains a specific clone of Azotobacter chroococcum bacteria, conc.106 cells/ml. Biogein is produced by the Bio-fertilizers Unit, General Organization of Agriculture Equalization Fund, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

To apply biofertilizer, mix a small amount of water with sugar and add biofertilizer to this sugar solution, then lightly sprinkle the solution on grains and mix well to ensure all grains are uniformly coated, and then dry the coated grains in the shade for 24 hours before sowing to protect microorganisms from sunlight exposure. These treatment grains were sown, and mineral nitrogen was applied at the same average in the experiment.

Experimental design:

In each season, a split-plot design in a randomized complete block design arrangement with three replications was used. The main plots contained all nitrogen treatments and a mix of nitrogen and biofertilizer, and sub plots contain cultivars. The experimental plot area was 4.2 m2. (Six rows, 3.5 m long and 0.2 m apart). All recommended agricultural practices were applied as recommended for the wheat crop. The treatments of the experiment:

 Mineral nitrogen (N) was applied on soil: 1- 35kg N/fed mineral fertilizer (N35). 2- 55kg N/fed mineral fertilizer (N55). 3- 75kg N/fed mineral fertilizer (N75).

The treatments of the mix between mineral nitrogen (N) and biofertilizer (B) were applied on soil: 1- 35kg N/fed mineral fertilizer and biofertilizer (B+N35). 2- 55kg N/fed mineral fertilizer and biofertilizer (B+N55). 3- 75kg N/fed mineral fertilizer and biofertilizer (B+N75).

Mineral nitrogen fertilizer in the form of ammonium nitrate (33.5%N), as a source of nitrogen, was added in three doses at sowing, the first and the second irrigation. The dose of P was 15 kg P2O5 as super phosphate (15.5% P2O5) was broadcasted at the time of soil preparation and 50 kg of K as potassium sulfate (50% K2O), was added with the first irrigation. Three Egyptian wheat cultivars were characterized by its high yield and thrives in this region were used in this investigation (Table 1)

 

Table 2. The cultivars used in this study and their pedigree and selection history.

Cultivar

Pedigree and selection history

Sakha95

PASTOR//SITE/MO/3/CHEN/AEGILOPS SQUARROSA (TAUS)//BCN/4/WELL1

CMA01Y00158S-040POY-040M-030ZIM-040SY26M-0Y-0B-0ET

Misr4

NS732/HER/3/PRL/ SARA// TSI/VEE 5/6/FRET 2/5/WHEAR/SOKOLL

CM SA09Y007125-050Y- 050ZTM-0NJ-099NJ-0B-0EG.

Sids14

Bow"S"/Vee"S"// Bow"S"/TSI/3/Bani Sewef 1.

SD293-1SD-2SD-4SD-0SD.

 

Recorded Data:

Date were recorded for plant height (cm) (PH), number of spikes/m2 (S/m2), number of kernels/spike (K/S), 1000- kernel weight (1000-KW) (gm), grain yield (GY) (ard./fed) (one ard.= 150 kg and one fed.= 4200m2).

Statistical analysis:

Data were subjected to the proper statistical analysis as the technique of analysis of variance (ANOVA) of split plot arrengement in randomized complete block design according to Gomez and Gomez (1984). Treatments means were compared using the least significant difference (LSD) test as outlined by Waller and Duncan (1969). Computation was done using computer software SPSS (IBM crop 2021). Combined analysis of variance across the two seasons was also performed if the homogeneity test was non-significant according to Levene (1960).


Results Discussion


Mean performance

For plant height trait Table (2) showed significant differences between the three wheat cultivars in the two seasons and overall. According data in Table 2, increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates and the mix between mineral and biofertilizer from 35 kg N/ fed to 75 kg N/ fed led to significant improvements in plant height.

Table (2). Means of plant height (cm) for three bread wheat cultivars for two seasons and overall under treatments of fertilization.

Season 1

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

Cultivars

N 75

N 55

N 35

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

102.4

97.8

96.3

100.1

97.7

101.7

99.3

Misr 4

110.5

105.9

100

101

106.5

111.1

105.8

Sids 14

107.2

100.2

101.6

103.1

105

107

104

mean

106.7

101.3

99.3

101.4

103.1

106.6

103.1

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

2.41

Cultivars (C)

 

2.1

F x C

 

NS

Season 2

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 75

N 55

N 35

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

103.5

98.9

97.4

101.2

98.8

102.8

100.4

Misr 4

111.6

107

102.6

100.4

107.6

112.2

106.9

Sids 14

108.3

101.3

102.7

104.2

106.1

108.1

105.1

mean

107.8

102.4

100.9

101.9

104.2

107.7

104.2

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

2.19

Cultivars (C)

 

2.08

F x C

 

NS

Overall

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

96.8

98.3

103.5

100.6

98.3

102.8

99.9

Misr 4

101.3

106.4

111.6

100.7

107

112.2

106.4

sids 14

102.2

100.8

108.3

103.6

105.6

108.1

104.6

mean

100.1

101.8

107.8

101.7

103.6

107.7

103.6

LSD 0.05

 

Season(S)

 

NS

Fertilizer(F)

 

1.52

S x F

 

NS

Cultivars (C)

 

1.44

S x C

 

NS

F x C

 

3.21

S x F x C

 

NS

 

Under 55 and 75 kg N/fed the tallest cultivar was Misr 4 (105.9 and 110.5 cm) respectively in the first season and (107 and 111.6 cm) respectively in the second. and also under the mix between biofertilizer and mineral (B+55 and B+75 kg N/fed) Misr 4 had (106.5 and 111.1 cm) respectively in the first season and (107.6 and 112.2 cm) respectively in the second season. As general the mix between biofertilizer and mineral nitrogen fertilizer gave taller plants. The increase in plant height due to the biofertilizer used may be attributed to the increase of cell division and enlargement, which led to raising plant height according to enhancement of dry matter accumulation that was stored in the spike, therefore gave increase in length of spike several investigators such as Ali et al. (2011), Farag and El-khawaga (2013), Kakraliya et al. (2017), Abdel-Lateef (2018) as well as Mona and Hala (2023). The significant increase in plant height can be attributed to the biofertilizers, which stimulated plant growth through better nutrient absorption (Yan et al., 2024).

For number of spikes/m2 data showed in Table (3) showed that by adding mineral nitrogen or mixing mineral and biofertilizer was showed a significant increased. Sakha 95 was having the highest value of number of spikes/m2 for two seasons and overall data and recorded under 35, 55 and 75 kg N/fed (218.3, 263.7 and 274.3) respectively in the first season and in the second season recorded  (204.7, 266.7 and 277.3) respectively. Also Sakha 95 was recorded under (B+35, B+55 and B+75 kg N/fed) in first season (220.3, 276.3 and 283.7) respectively and in the second season (203.3, 279.3 and 286.7) respectively. The positive effect of such fertilizers (mineral N and biofertilizer +mineral N) on spikes number might be attributed to their roles in increasing the amount of metabolites synthesized, which promoted the numbers of tillers. This data is similar by Attia and Abd El Salam (2016) and Al-Amin et al. (2017) and Kaur et al. (2018).

 

Table (3). Means of number of spikes/m2 (S/m2) for three bread wheat cultivars for two seasons and overall under treatments of fertilization.

Season 1

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

Cultivars

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

218.30

263.70

274.30

220.30

276.30

283.70

256.10

Misr 4

179.00

212.30

241.00

175.00

220.30

261.70

214.90

Sids 14

214.30

240.30

268.30

206.30

233.00

270.30

238.80

mean

203.90

238.80

261.20

200.60

243.20

271.90

236.60

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

14.43

Cultivars (C)

 

7.51

F x C

 

NS

Season 2

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

204.70

266.70

277.30

203.30

279.30

286.70

253.00

Misr 4

185.30

215.30

244.00

178.00

223.30

264.70

218.40

Sids 14

199.00

243.30

271.30

196.00

236.00

273.30

236.50

mean

196.30

241.80

264.20

192.40

246.20

274.90

236.00

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

12.21

Cultivars (C)

 

7.59

F x C

 

NS

Overall

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

211.50

265.20

275.80

211.80

277.80

285.20

254.60

Misr 4

182.20

213.80

242.50

176.50

221.80

263.20

216.70

sids 14

206.70

241.80

269.80

201.20

234.50

271.80

237.60

mean

200.10

240.30

262.70

196.50

244.70

273.40

236.30

LSD 0.05

 

Season(S)

 

NS

Fertilizer(F)

 

8.85

S x F

 

NS

Cultivars (C)

 

5.20

S x C

 

NS

F x C

 

13.37

S x F x C

 

NS

 

Data in Table (4) showed significant differences of number of kernels/spike (K/S) for three wheat cultivars in the two seasons and overall under all fertilization treatments. Data in Table (4) also showed increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates from 35 kg N/ fad to 75 kg N/ fed led to significant improvements in number of kernels/spike and also with adding biofertilizer and mineral nitrogen. In the first season Sids 14 had the highest value of number of kernels/spike under 75 kg N/fed (70.79) and Misr 4 under 35 and 55 kg N/fed (62.23 and 66.23) respectively, and in the second season Misr 4 had the highest value of number of kernels/spike under three levels of mineral nitrogen (35, 55 and 75 kg N/fed) (60.00, 70.33 and 74.78) respectively, and in the mix between  biofertilizer+N in the first season Misr 4 had the highest value (63.79 and 74.90) respectively under  B+ 35 and B+75 kg N/fed. The highest value of the second season was Sids 14 was the highest value under  B+ 75 kg N/fed (75.89)  and Misr 4 under (B+35 and B+55 kg N/fed) was (68.78 and 70.00), The positive effects of mixing between mineral and biofertilizers on number of kernels/spike were previously reported by Mandic et al. (2015), Adnan et al. (2016), Attia and Abd El Salam (2016) and Aulakh (2010).

Table (4). Means of number of kernels/spike (K/S) for three bread wheat cultivars for two seasons and overall under treatments of fertilization.

Season 1

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

Cultivars

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

53.68

62.90

70.01

58.90

69.23

73.68

64.73

Misr 4

62.23

66.23

69.01

63.90

68.68

74.79

67.47

Sids 14

61.68

65.01

70.79

67.68

68.90

72.01

67.68

mean

59.20

64.71

69.94

63.49

68.94

73.49

66.63

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

2.08

Cultivars (C)

 

1.38

F x C

 

3.32

Season 2

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

60.00

67.33

70.11

68.78

70.00

73.11

68.22

Misr 4

60.00

70.33

74.78

59.33

66.11

75.89

67.74

Sids 14

60.44

67.44

71.89

54.78

64.00

71.11

64.94

mean

60.15

68.37

72.26

60.96

66.70

73.37

66.97

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

1.64

Cultivars (C)

 

1.30

F x C

 

2.96

Overall

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

56.84

65.12

70.06

63.84

69.62

73.39

66.48

Misr 4

61.12

68.28

71.89

61.61

67.39

75.34

67.61

sids 14

61.06

66.23

71.34

61.23

66.45

71.56

66.31

mean

59.67

66.54

71.10

62.23

67.82

73.43

66.80

LSD 0.05

 

Season(S)

 

1.41

Fertilizer(F)

 

1.24

S x F

 

1.91

Cultivars (C)

 

0.92

S x C

 

1.56

F x C

 

2.18

S x F x C

 

3.18

For 1000 kernels weight in table (5) application of biofertilizer and all levels of mineral fertilizers either separately or mixed tended to significantly increase 1000 kernel weight in both seasons, The heaviest 1000 kernel weight were recorded by Sakha 95 in the first season by (43.20, 48.33 and 51.44 gm) respectively under 35, 55. 75 kg N/fed, under biofertilizer and mineral nitrogen (B+35, B+55 and B+75 kg N/fed) was (47.84, 52.57 and 55.26gm) respectively. In the second season Misr 4 had the heaviest weight under all levels of mineral nitrogen (35, 55 and 75 kg N/fed) was (44.40, 49.53 and 52.64 gm) respectively and in biofertilizer+ mineral nitrogen fertilization (B+35, B+55 and B+75 kg N/fed) was (49.04, 51.44 and 53.80 gm). In this context, Mengel and Kirkby (2001) stated that translocation of photoassimilate from the vegetative tissues to kernels was much affected by plant nutrition status, which leads to promote cells division and buildup of storage capacity. The increase in 1000 kernel weight by application of different fertilizers were previously reported by Noureldin et al., (2013) and Mandic et al., (2015).

Table (5). Means of 1000 kernel weight (gm) (1000KW) for three bread wheat cultivars for two seasons and overall under treatments of fertilization.

Season 1

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

Cultivars

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

43.20

48.33

51.44

47.84

52.57

55.26

49.77

Misr 4

41.00

47.27

48.93

43.77

48.65

50.14

46.63

Sids 14

43.57

45.48

47.90

45.04

47.32

48.50

46.30

mean

42.59

47.03

49.42

45.55

49.52

51.3

47.57

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

0.73

Cultivars (C)

 

0.75

F x C

 

1.62

Season 2

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

42.20

42.12

51.44

44.97

45.18

49.34

44.54

Misr 4

44.40

49.53

48.93

49.04

51.44

53.80

50.14

Sids 14

44.77

46.68

47.90

46.24

48.52

49.70

47.50

mean

43.79

46.11

49.42

46.75

48.38

50.95

47.40

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

0.67

Cultivars (C)

 

0.77

F x C

 

1.65

Overall

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

42.70

45.23

47.45

46.40

48.88

52.30

47.16

Misr 4

42.70

48.40

50.78

46.40

50.05

51.97

48.38

sids 14

44.17

46.08

48.50

45.64

47.92

49.10

46.9

mean

43.19

46.57

48.91

46.15

48.95

51.13

47.48

LSD 0.05

 

Season(S)

 

NS

Fertilizer(F)

 

0.46

S x F

 

0.64

Cultivars (C)

 

0.52

S x C

 

0.65

F x C

 

1.13

S x F x C

 

1.60

For grain yield/fad in table (6) the highest weight of GY (ard/fed) in the first season and under 75 kg N/fed was Sakha 95had the highest weight (26.27 ard/fed) and under 35 and 55 kg N/fed Misr 4 had the highest weight (15.22 and 25.22 ard/fed). On the other hand used the mix of mineral and bio fertilizer (B+35, B+55 andB+75 kg N/fed) Misr 4 had the highest weight was (15.37, 25.91 and 31.51 ard/fed). In the second season Misr 4 had the highest weight (15.67, 25.89 and 27.58 ard/fed) respectively under the tree levels of mineral nitrogen and Misr 4 also in mineral and biofertilizer (16.93, 26.11 and 30.85 ard/fed) this trend as the similar in 

Table (6). Means of grain yield ard./faddan (Ard/fed) (Gy) for three bread wheat cultivars for two seasons and overall under treatments of fertilization.

Season 1

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

Cultivars

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

12.65

20.56

26.27

14.35

26.13

30.24

21.70

Misr 4

15.22

25.22

26.02

15.37

25.91

31.51

23.21

Sids 14

11.08

22.40

24.82

18.31

23.22

27.46

21.21

mean

12.98

22.72

25.70

16.01

25.08

29.74

22.04

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

2.00

Cultivars (C)

 

1.28

F x C

 

3.11

Season 2

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

13.36

21.27

23.87

15.91

21.25

25.8

20.24

Misr 4

15.67

25.89

27.58

16.93

26.11

30.85

23.84

Sids 14

13.09

22.11

26.38

19.87

24.78

29.02

22.54

mean

14.04

23.09

25.94

17.57

24.05

28.56

22.21

LSD 0.05

 

Fertilizer(F)

 

2.29

Cultivars (C)

 

1.07

F x C

 

NS

Overall

Nitrogen fertilizer

Bio-fertilizer+Nitrogen

Mean

 

N 35

N 55

N 75

B+ N35

B+N 55

B+N 75

Sakha 95

13.00

20.91

25.07

15.13

23.69

28.02

20.97

Misr 4

15.44

25.55

26.80

16.15

26.01

31.18

23.52

sids 14

12.09

22.25

25.60

19.09

24.00

28.24

21.88

mean

13.51

22.91

25.82

16.79

24.56

29.15

22.12

LSD 0.05

 

Season(S)

 

NS

Fertilizer(F)

 

1.42

S x F

 

NS

Cultivars (C)

 

0.81

S x C

 

2.09

F x C

 

2.11

S x F x C

 

NS

 

The superiority of Misr 4 might be attributed to its superiority in yield components, i.e. number of spikes/m2, number of kernels/spike and 1000 kernel weight. According to other researchers found significant variation among wheat varieties in grain yield in favor of Gemmeiza 10 and Sids 12 (Noureldin et al., 2013), (Dawood et al., 2014) and Gemmeiza 11 (Khaled and Hammad, 2014 and El-Seidy et al., 2017). Sharma et al., 2021 reported that when plants can allocate a greater proportion of their biomass towards grain production, it can lead to increased yields and improved crop performance. 


Conclusion


Increasing nitrogen fertilizer rates from 35 kg N/ fed to 75 kg N/ fed led to significant improvement of all traits for all cultivars and when adding biofertilizer to mineral the improvement was higher. All cultivars showed significant increase for all traits especially with adding biofertilizer to mineral. Increase in yield and its components for all cultivars  due to application of  biofertilizer was obvious and might be due to the role of biofertilizer in enhancing soil biological activity, which improved nutrient mobilization from organic and chemical sources. Also, biofertilizer plays a significant role in regulating the dynamics of organic matter decomposition and the availability of plant nutrients and in increasing nitrogen fixation. In this respect Bahrani and Hagh (2010) and Zaki et al (2016) reported a positive effect on yield and yield components of wheat when inoculated with biofertilizer was found. Ramadhan (2022) used five combinations of organic and inorganic nutrient and revealed that organic and inorganic amendments affected plant growth, yield components, grain yield significantly.


References


Abbas, G., J.Z.K.A.Khattak, M. Mir, M. Ishaque, H.Hussain, M.Wahedi, M.S. Ahmed and A. Ullah (2012). Effect of organic manures with recommended dose of NPK on the performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 22(3): 683-687. ISSN: 1018- 7081 [Google Scholar]

http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/v-22-3/26.pdf

Abdel- Lateef, A. A. (2018). Effect of mineral and bio fertilizers on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under south west Suez Canal conditions. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 9 (2): 173 - 179.

https://journals.ekb.eg/article_35366.html

Adnan, M., Z. Shah, Hidayat Ullah, B. Khan, M. Arshad, I.A. Mian, G.A. Khan, M. Alam, Abdul Basir, Inayat-Ur- Rahman, M. Ali and W. Khan (2016). Yield response of wheat to nitrogen and potassium fertilization. Pure Appl. Biol., 5 (4): 868-875.

https://www.thepab.org/index.php/journal/article/download/2207/1439

Al-Amin, M.A., A.K. Hasan, M.H. Ali, S. Nessa and M.N. Islam (2017). Effect of mulching and organic manure on growth and yield performance of wheat. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science 2 (3): 134-140.

https://journals.aesacademy.org/index.php/aaes/article/view/02-03-01

Ali, A., A. Ahmad, W.H. Sayed, T. Khaliq, M. Asif, M. Aziz and M. Mubeen. (2011). Effects of nitrogen on growth and yield components of wheat. (Report). Sci. Int. 23. (4) 331-332.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305471633

Attia, M.A. and A.A. Abd El Salam (2016). Effect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilizer on yield and yield components of bread wheat at Siwa Oasis. Alex. J. Agric. Sci., 61 (3): 211-219.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380262613

Aulakh, M. S. (2010). Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop production, improving crop quality and soil health, and minimizing environmental pollution. In 19th world congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world. 1 – 6 August, Brisbane, Australia.79-82.

https://old.iuss.org/19th%20WCSS/Symposium/pdf/0920.pdf

Bahrani, A.J.P. and M.J. Hagh (2010). Response of winter wheat to co-inoculation with azotobacter and arbescular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under different sources of nitrogen fertilizer. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 8 (1): 95-103. https://idosi.org/aejaes/jaes8(1)/14.pdf

Campuzano G.E., G.A.Slafer and D.J. Miralles (2012). Differences in yield biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Field Crops Research. 128:167-179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429012000056

Dawood, Mona G., Ebtihal M. Abd Elhamid, Magda A. F. Shalaby and Karima Gamal El- Din (2014). Physiological response of two wheat cultivars grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil to α-tocopherol foliar application. Middle East J. of Applied Sciences, 4 (3): 771-778. https://www.curresweb.com/mejas/mejas/2014/771-778.pdf

Darjee, S., R. Singh, G. Alekhya, M. Shrivastava, S. D. Mishra and N. Dwivedi. (2024). Investigating the impact of biofertilizer (Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza) on nitrogen losses and yield in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields. Current Innovation in Agriculture Science. 1 (1): 43-49 https://ciasjournal.com/

El-Seidy, E.H., A. A. Morad, R.A. El-Refaey and Nehal Kh. El-Hadidy (2017). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer levels on some wheat varieties belonging two species. Menoufia J. Plant Prod., (2): 207 – 217. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_176186.html

El-Sorady, G.A., A.A.A. El-Banna, A.M. Abdelghany, E.A.A., Salama, H.M. Ali, M.H. Siddiqui, N.G. Hayatu, L.S. Paszt and S.F. Lamlom (2022). Response of bread wheat cultivars inoculated with azotobacter species under different nitrogen application rates. Sustainability, 14(14):8394 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8394

Farag, I.A.A. and A.A.H. El-Khawaga (2013). Influnce of gamma irradiation and nitrogen fertilizer levels on Gammeza -9 wheat cultivar yield and its attributes. Arab J. Nuclear Sci. and Appl., 46 (2): 363-371. https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-934673

Farid, I. M., M. H. Abbas, and A. El-Ghozoli, (2023). Wheat productivity as influenced by integrated mineral, organic and biofertilization. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 63(3): 287-299. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_308878.html

Gomez, K.A and A.A Gomez, (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research 2nd Ed., John Willey and Sons. New York, U.S.A. https://scip.org

Hassan, M.A., H.H. Elsebaay and G.A. Elsharawy (2014). Effect of inoculation by azospirillum, with nitrogen fertilizer on some bread and durum wheat varieties characteristics. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 29(3) 90-103. https://journals.ekb.eg

IBM crop (2021). IBM SPSS statics for windows, version 28.0. Armonk, NY. USA: IBM crop https://www.scirp.org

Kakraliya, Sk., N. Kumar, S. Dahiya, S. Sihag, Yadav, and M. Singh. (2017). Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth dynamics and productivity trend of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated cropping system. J. of Plant Development Sci. 9 (1): 11-15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320298413

Kandil, A.A., M.H. El-Hindi, M.A.Badawi, S.A.E-Morasy and F.A.H.M. Kalboush (2011). Response of wheat to rate of nitrogen bio-fertilizer and land leveling. Crop and Environment. 2 (1):46-51. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster

Kaur, T., B. S. Brar, and N. S. Dhillon (2018). Soil organic matter dynamics as affected by long term use of organic and inorganic fertilizers under maize–wheat cropping system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 81(1): 59-69. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10705-007-9152-0

Khaled, M.A. and S.M. Hammad (2014). Effect of nitrogen and potassium levels on yield and its components of four new bread wheat cultivars. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 5 (1): 95-105. https://www.academia.edu

Levene, H. (1960). Robust test for equality of variences. In contribution to probability and statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling,I. Olkin,S. G. Ghurye,W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, and H. B Mann (eds), 278-292. Stanford, California: Stanford university press. USA https://www.sciepub.com

Liang, Z., J. Li, X. Cao, Y. Tang, F. Mo, V. Nangia and Y. Liu. (2024). Responses of wheat nitrogen uptake and utilization, rhizosphere bacterial composition and nitrogen-cycling functional genes to nitrogen application rate, planting density and their interactions. Applied Soil Ecology, 193, 105-143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929139323003414

Mandic, V., V. Krnjaja, Z. Tomic, Z. Bijelic, A. Simic, D. R. Muslic and M. Gogic (2015). Nitrogen fertilizer influence on wheat yield and use efficiency under different environmental conditions. Chilean J. of Agricultural Research, 75 (1): 92-97. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-58392015000100013

Mahmud, N. U., D. R. Gupta, S. K. Paul, M. Chakraborty, M. S. Mehebub, M. Z. Surovy and T. Islam, (2022). Daylight-driven rechargeable TiO2 nanocatalysts suppress wheat blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 95 (8): 1263-1271. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bcsj/95/8/95_BCSJ.2022-0010/_article

Mengel, K. and E.A.Kirkby (2001). Principles of Plant Nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 849 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1009-2.

Mona H. A. Hussein and Hala A. M. El-Syed. (2023). Wheat productivity as affected by replacement of mineral fertilizers (NPK) with PGPR, as biofertilizer in combination with compost as organic fertilizer under new reclaimed sandy soil. Middle East J. Agric. Res., 12(1): 11-20. https://www.curresweb.com/mejar/mejar/2023/11-20.pdf

Noureldin, Nemat A., H.S. Saudy, F. Ashmawy and H.M. Saed (2013). Grain yield response index of bread wheat cultivars as influenced by nitrogen levels. Annals of Agricultural Science, 58 (2): 147–152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0570178313000341

Ozkan, R., M. Bayhan, L. Yorulmaz, M. Oner, M. Yildirim. (2021). Effect of different organic fertilizers on bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. Int J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci. 5 (3):433-442 https://www.ijafes.com/

Ramadhan, M. N. (2022). Yield Performance of Wheat Under Different Practices of Tillage and Integrated Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers. In IOP Conference Series : Earth and Environmental Science, 1060 (1): 012-090.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012090

Reddy, S.S., B. Shivaraj, V.C., Reddy, and M.G. Ananda (2005). Direct effect of fertilizer and residual effect of organic manure on yield and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) in groundnut-maize cropping system. Crop Res. Hsiao, 29(3): 390-395. https://eurekamag.com

Sharma, A., G. S. Dheri and S. P. Saini, (2021). Long-term nutrient management affects nitrogen dynamics and crop yield in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system. The Indian journal of agricultural sciences, 91(8): 1174-1179.

https://epubs.icar.org.in/

Sharma, J., S. Kumar, V. Kumar, P. Singh, P. Khyalia, S. Verma and A. Sharma (2023). Foliar application of glycine betaine to ameliorate lead toxicity in barley plants by modulating antioxidant enzyme activity and biochemical parameters. Environmental research communications. 5 (7): 002-075.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ace075

Waller, R.A. and D.B. Duncan. (1969). A bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1484-1503. https://psycnet.apa.org

Wang, S., J. Shan, Y. Xia, Q. Tang, L. Xia, J. Lin and X. Yan. (2017). Different effects of biochar and a nitrification inhibitor application on paddy soil denitrification: a field experiment over two consecutive rice-growing seasons. Science of The Total Environment. 593: 347-356. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Yan, Q., Y. Lu, Y. Pang, H. Zhao, J. Liu, M. Liu and S. Liu, (2024). TaCRTISO dosage modulates plant height and spike number per plant in wheat. Plant Physiology, 194(4): 2208-2212 https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/194/4/2208/7450000

Zaki, N.M., M.A.Gomaa, F.I.Radwan, M.S.Hassanein and A.M. Wali (2012). Effect of mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilizer on yield, yield components and chemical composition of some wheat cultivars, Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 8(1):174-191. https://scolar.google.co.uk

Zaki, N. M., M.S. Hassanein, Amal G. Ahmed, M.A. Ahmed and M.M. Tawifk (2016). Response of two wheat cultivars to different nitrogen sources in newly cultivated land. Res. J. of Pharmaceutical, Biolog. and Chem. Sci., 7 (6): 410-416. https://www.rjpbcs.com


Cite This Article


APA Style

A.I.A. Yahya, E. Gh. Ahmed, Zainab A.A. El-Rashidy. (2026). Effect of mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer on yield and its components of some bread wheat cultivars. Madras Agricultural Journal, 113, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.261411

ACS Style

A.I.A. Yahya; E. Gh. Ahmed; Zainab A.A. El-Rashidy. Effect of Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Biofertilizer on Yield and Its Components of Some Bread Wheat Cultivars. Madras Agric. J. 2026, 113, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.261411

AMA Style

A.I.A. Yahya, E.Gh. Ahmed, Zainab A.A. El-Rashidy. Effect of mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer on yield and its components of some bread wheat cultivars. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2026;113:74–84. doi:10.29321/MAJ.10.261411

Author Information


Abdelaziz Ibrahim Abdelsadek Yahya


© Madras Agricultural Journal. Website design – All rights reserved.