Applying zinc sulphate significantly improved grain yield, economic returns, and soil zinc status across two consecutive Kharif seasons.Grain yields were notably higher in zinc-treated plots than control plots (Tables 1 and 2). During2019–20, zinc-treated plots achieved an average yield of 6,339 kg/ha, an 8.7% increase over the control plots (5,790 kg/ha). During 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots recorded the highest average yield of 6,511 kg/ha, followed by residual plots (6,352 kg/ha) and control plots (5,922 kg/ha). These findings highlight the sustained benefits of zinc fertilization, both directly and through residual effects. The results align with studies by Prasad et al., (2012) and Cakmak (2008), which documented improved grain yield and panicle weight due to enhanced zinc availability.
Economic analysis showed a clear advantage for zinc-treated plots. In 2019–20, these plots recorded an average net return of ₹94,577/ha and a benefit-cost (B:C) ratio of 2.64, compared to ₹85,948/ha and a ratio of 2.62 for control plots. In 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots yielded the highest net return (₹98,691/ha) and a B:C ratio of 2.71, followed by residual plots (₹99,440/ha and 2.88) and control plots (₹88,888/ha and 2.68). These results emphasize the economic viability of zinc fertilization, corroborating Alloway’s (2008) observations that micronutrient application enhances economic returns by boosting crop productivity and quality.
Soil analysis revealed substantial improvements in zinc levels due to zinc application.
Statistical analysis reveals that application of zinc sulphate in rice shows a significant difference in yield and net returns (Table 3). During 2019-20, yield was significantly higher in zinc-treated plots, at a1% level of significance. Whereas, net returns showed a significant difference at the 5% level of significance. During 2020-21, both yield and net returns were significantly higher in zinc-treated plots at the 5% level of significance.
The initial soil zinc content averaged 0.809 ppm, which increased to 1.165 ppm in zinc-treated plots. Meanwhile, control plots were depleted, and their zinc levels were depleted to 0.610 during 2019-20. During 2020-21, control plots recorded an average of 0.848 ppm, while residual plots-maintained zinc levels of 0.928 ppm, demonstrating the carryover effect of zinc fertilization, and zinc-treated plots recorded higher zinc levels of 1.333 ppm. These findings support the work of Shivay et al., (2010), who emphasized the role of zinc fertilizers in replenishing soil reserves and maintaining fertility over time.
The results underscore zinc's importance as an essential micronutrient in paddy cultivation. Zinc’s physiological role in enzyme activation, protein synthesis, and photosynthesis underpins the observed yield improvements (Cakmak, 2008). The residual effects of zinc application further suggest that periodic supplementation can sustainably enhance productivity while minimizing input costs. However, Continuous zinc application proved to be the most effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability. The improved soil zinc status observed in treated plots also addresses long-term concerns about soil fertility, ensuring sustainable agricultural practices.
These findings advocate for including zinc sulphate in nutrient management strategies for paddy cultivation, particularly in zinc-deficient soils. Future research could investigate optimal application rates, methods, and long-term implications on soil health and crop rotations to refine recommendations for farmers.
Table 3. Summary of one-way ANOVA during the two years of study
2019-20
|
Treatments
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
F-value
|
P-value
|
|
Yield
|
|
T1
|
12
|
6339
|
333.79
|
4.3009**
|
0.0003
|
|
T2
|
12
|
5790
|
299.15
|
|
Net returns
|
|
T1
|
12
|
94577
|
8010.9
|
4.3009*
|
0.0109
|
|
T2
|
12
|
85948
|
7179.7
|
**Significant at 1% level of significance
* Significant at 5% level of significance
2020-21
|
Treatments
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
F-value
|
P-value
|
|
Yield
|
|
T1
|
12
|
5922
|
342.4
|
3.2849*
|
0.0212
|
|
T2
|
12
|
6352
|
608.9
|
|
T3
|
12
|
6511
|
530.2
|
|
Net returns
|
|
T1
|
12
|
88888
|
7813.6
|
3.2594*
|
0.0452
|
|
T2
|
12
|
99440
|
14613.7
|
|
T3
|
12
|
98691
|
12726.1
|