Madras Agricultural Journal
Loading.. Please wait
Research Article | Open Access | Peer Review

Influence of Zinc Application on Yield, Economics, and Soil Zinc Status in Paddy

Sahaja Deva ORCID iD , M. Mallikarjun ORCID iD , Prasanna Lakshmi Ravuri ORCID iD , Ganesh Kumar Perneti ORCID iD , M. Reddi Kumar ORCID iD , M. K. Jyosthna ORCID iD
Volume : 112
Issue: December(10-12)
Pages: 104 - 109
Downloads: 3
Published: November 27, 2025
Download

Abstract


This study assessed the impact of zinc sulphate application on paddy yield, economic returns, and soil zinc status in 12 farmer fields across four villages during the Kharif seasons of 2019–20 and 2020–21. Treatments included basal zinc sulphate application at25 kg/ha, control (no zinc), residual effect plots, and continuous zinc-treated plots, with the RNR 15048 variety grown on clay soils with neutral pH and varying nutrient levels. Results revealed that zinc application significantly enhanced grain yield, with treated plots averaging 6,339 kg/ha compared to 5,790 kg/ha in control plots in 2019–20. During 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots produced the highest yield of 6,511 kg/ha, followed by residual plots (6,352 kg/ha) and control plots (5,922 kg/ha). Economic analysis showed higher net returns and benefit-cost ratios for zinc-treated plots, with treated plots recording ₹94,577/ha anda B:C ratio of 2.64 in 2019–20, compared to ₹85,948/ha and 2.62 for control plots. In 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots yielded ₹98,691/ha with a B:C ratio of 2.71, outperforming residual and control plots. Soil analysis indicated improved zinc content, increasing from an initial average of 0.992 ppm to 1.325 ppm in treated plots by 2020–21, while control plots averaged 0.848 ppm. These findings underscore the benefits of zinc application for enhancing paddy yield, profitability, and soil health, with continuous zinc application offering the most significant advantages for sustainable cultivation.

DOI
Pages
104 - 109
Creative Commons
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Madras Agricultural Students' Union in Madras Agricultural Journal (MAJ). This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited by the user.

Keywords


Zinc sulphate Paddy yield Economic analysis Soil zinc status Residual effect

Introduction


Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food crop for more than half of the world's population and is pivotal in global food security. To achieve sustainable productivity, the availability of essential nutrients, particularly micronutrients like zinc, is critical. Zinc deficiency in soils is a widespread problem, particularly in regions with high pH, low organic matter, or intensive agricultural practices. It adversely affects plant growth, grain yield, and quality, ultimately threatening food security (Alloway, 2008).

Zinc is vital for plants' physiological and biochemical processes, including enzyme activation, protein synthesis, and membrane integrity. Its deficiency is known to impair growth, reduce chlorophyll content, and limit carbohydrate metabolism, leading to reduced grain production (Cakmak, 2008). Studies have indicated that applying zinc fertilizers, such as zinc sulphate, significantly improves the availability of zinc in the soil and enhances crop productivity. Prasad et al., (2012) observed a positive correlation between zinc application and rice yield, noting improvements in grain weight and number per panicle.

While the benefits of zinc application on crop yield and soil health have been established, there is a growing need to evaluate its residual effects and economic viability under varied field conditions. This study examines the influence of zinc sulphate application on paddy yield, economics, and soil zinc status over two consecutive Kharif seasons. It aims to provide insights into the sustainability of zinc application practices for maximizing productivity and profitability while maintaining soil health.

Methodology


The study was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2019–20 and 2020–21 across 12 farms in four villages: Palem, Yellampalli, Dasireddygaripalli, and Gayamvaripalli. The experimental fields comprised clay soils with neutral pH, low electrical conductivity, high organic carbon content, low available nitrogen, and medium phosphorus and potassium levels. The paddy variety RNR 15048 was chosen for its adaptability and yield potential. Treatments in 2019–20 included the application of zinc sulphate at 25 kg/ha (T1) and a control plot without zinc (T2). In 2020–21, three treatments were established: control plots with no zinc application (T1), residual plots to assess the carryover effect of previous zinc application (T2), and continuous zinc-treated plots where zinc sulphate was applied at 25 kg/ha (T3).The experiment involved land preparation followed by the basal application of zinc sulphate in treatment plots. Seeds were soaked in gunny bags for 12 hours, sprouted over three days, and sown in a nursery in July. Transplantation of one-month-old seedlings into the main field was carried out with standard agronomic practices, including irrigation, weed management, and pest control. NPK fertilizers were applied per local recommendations, and a foliar spray of zinc sulphate was performed one month after the basal application. Harvesting occurred in November, and grain yield was measured after threshing and sun-drying.

Initial and final soil samples were collected from five random spots within each treatment plot and analyzed for zinc content through Atomic Absorption Spectrometry in the laboratory. The cost of cultivation, gross, and net returns were calculated based on prevailing market prices, and the benefit-cost ratio was derived. Statistical data analysis was conducted using SPSS software to evaluate the significance of treatment effects.

Results Discussion


Applying zinc sulphate significantly improved grain yield, economic returns, and soil zinc status across two consecutive Kharif seasons.Grain yields were notably higher in zinc-treated plots than control plots (Tables 1 and 2). During2019–20, zinc-treated plots achieved an average yield of 6,339 kg/ha, an 8.7% increase over the control plots (5,790 kg/ha). During 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots recorded the highest average yield of 6,511 kg/ha, followed by residual plots (6,352 kg/ha) and control plots (5,922 kg/ha). These findings highlight the sustained benefits of zinc fertilization, both directly and through residual effects. The results align with studies by Prasad et al., (2012) and Cakmak (2008), which documented improved grain yield and panicle weight due to enhanced zinc availability.

Table 1. Effect of zinc sulphate application on yield and economics of rice during 2019-20:

S.No.

Village

Farmer

Grain Yield  (kg/ha)

Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha)

Gross Returns (Rs./ha)

Net Returns (Rs./ha)

B:C ratio

Treatment

Control

Treatment

Control

Treatment

Control

Treatment

Control

Treatment

Control

1

Dasireddygaripalli

K Reddappa Reddy

6268

5642

57565

53000

150432

135408

92867

82408

2.61

2.55

2

Dasireddygaripalli

K Anna Reddy

6648

6034

57565

53000

159552

144816

101987

91816

2.77

2.73

3

Dasireddygaripalli

P Shankar Reddy

6725

6134

57565

53000

161400

147216

103835

94216

2.80

2.78

4

Palem

B Chinnappa

6344

5500

57565

53000

152256

132000

94691

79000

2.64

2.49

5

Palem

M Ramana

6846

6000

57565

53000

164304

144000

106739

91000

2.85

2.72

6

Palem

B Krishnaiah

6450

6126

57565

53000

154800

147024

97235

94024

2.69

2.77

7

Gayamvaripalli

G Sreenivasulu Reddy

5820

5432

57565

53000

139680

130368

82115

77368

2.43

2.46

8

Gayamvaripalli

Kodatham Bhaskar

6235

5986

57565

53000

149640

143664

92075

90664

2.60

2.71

9

Gayamvaripalli

PadigalaRajendraiah

6145

5762

57565

53000

147480

138288

89915

85288

2.56

2.61

10

Yellampalli

Y Raghunath Reddy

6600

6000

57565

53000

158400

144000

100835

91000

2.75

2.72

11

Yellampalli

L  Mahindra Reddy

5790

5618

57565

53000

138960

134832

81395

81832

2.41

2.54

12

Yellampalli

L Malleswari

6200

5240

57565

53000

148800

125760

91235

72760

2.58

2.37

Average

6339

5790

57565

53000

152142

138948

94577

85948

2.64

2.62

 

Table 2. Effect of zinc sulphate application on yield and economics of rice during 2020-21

S.No.

Grain Yield  (kg/ha)

Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha)

Gross Returns (Rs./ha)

Net Returns (Rs./ha)

B:C ratio

T1

T2

T3

T1

T2

T3

T1

T2

T3

T1

T2

T3

T1

T2

T3

1

6040

6000

6160

53000

53000

57565

144960

144000

147840

91960

91000

90275

2.74

2.72

2.57

2

5373

5300

5613

53000

53000

57565

128952

127200

134712

75952

74200

77147

2.43

2.40

2.34

3

5820

6220

6268

53000

53000

57565

139680

149280

150432

86680

96280

92867

2.64

2.82

2.61

4

6373

6733

6868

53000

53000

57565

152952

161592

164832

99952

108592

107267

2.89

3.05

2.86

5

5750

7193

7140

53000

53000

57565

138000

172632

171360

85000

119632

113795

2.60

3.26

2.98

6

6453

6800

6960

53000

53000

57565

151720

163200

167040

98720

110200

109475

2.86

3.08

2.90

7

6268

6680

6713

53000

53000

57565

150432

160320

161112

97432

107320

103547

2.84

3.02

2.80

8

6000

7220

7373

53000

53000

57565

144000

173280

176952

91000

120280

119387

2.72

3.27

3.07

9

5620

5953

5840

53000

53000

57565

134880

142872

140160

81880

89872

82595

2.54

2.70

2.43

10

6060

6473

6500

53000

53000

57565

145440

155352

156000

92440

102352

98435

2.74

2.93

2.71

11

5468

5520

6560

53000

53000

57565

131232

132480

157440

78232

79480

99875

2.48

2.50

2.73

12

5840

6128

6133

53000

53000

57565

140160

147072

147192

87160

94072

89627

2.64

2.77

2.56

Average

5922

6352

6511

53000

53000

57565

141867

152440

156256

88888

99440

98691

2.68

2.88

2.71

 

  

Economic analysis showed a clear advantage for zinc-treated plots. In 2019–20, these plots recorded an average net return of ₹94,577/ha and a benefit-cost (B:C) ratio of 2.64, compared to ₹85,948/ha and a ratio of 2.62 for control plots. In 2020–21, continuous zinc-treated plots yielded the highest net return (₹98,691/ha) and a B:C ratio of 2.71, followed by residual plots (₹99,440/ha and 2.88) and control plots (₹88,888/ha and 2.68). These results emphasize the economic viability of zinc fertilization, corroborating Alloway’s (2008) observations that micronutrient application enhances economic returns by boosting crop productivity and quality.

Soil analysis revealed substantial improvements in zinc levels due to zinc application.

            Statistical analysis reveals that application of zinc sulphate in rice shows a significant difference in yield and net returns (Table 3). During 2019-20, yield was significantly higher in zinc-treated plots, at a1% level of significance. Whereas, net returns showed a significant difference at the 5% level of significance. During 2020-21, both yield and net returns were significantly higher in zinc-treated plots at the 5% level of significance.

The initial soil zinc content averaged 0.809 ppm, which increased to 1.165 ppm in zinc-treated plots. Meanwhile, control plots were depleted, and their zinc levels were depleted to 0.610 during 2019-20. During 2020-21, control plots recorded an average of 0.848 ppm, while residual plots-maintained zinc levels of 0.928 ppm, demonstrating the carryover effect of zinc fertilization, and zinc-treated plots recorded higher zinc levels of 1.333 ppm. These findings support the work of Shivay et al., (2010), who emphasized the role of zinc fertilizers in replenishing soil reserves and maintaining fertility over time.

The results underscore zinc's importance as an essential micronutrient in paddy cultivation. Zinc’s physiological role in enzyme activation, protein synthesis, and photosynthesis underpins the observed yield improvements (Cakmak, 2008). The residual effects of zinc application further suggest that periodic supplementation can sustainably enhance productivity while minimizing input costs. However, Continuous zinc application proved to be the most effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability. The improved soil zinc status observed in treated plots also addresses long-term concerns about soil fertility, ensuring sustainable agricultural practices.

These findings advocate for including zinc sulphate in nutrient management strategies for paddy cultivation, particularly in zinc-deficient soils. Future research could investigate optimal application rates, methods, and long-term implications on soil health and crop rotations to refine recommendations for farmers.

Table 3. Summary of one-way ANOVA during the two years of study

2019-20

Treatments

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

F-value

P-value

Yield

T1

12

6339

333.79

4.3009**

0.0003

T2

12

5790

299.15

Net returns

T1

12

94577

8010.9

4.3009*

0.0109

T2

12

85948

7179.7

**Significant at 1% level of significance

* Significant at 5% level of significance

2020-21

Treatments

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

F-value

P-value

Yield

T1

12

5922

342.4

3.2849*

0.0212

T2

12

6352

608.9

T3

12

6511

530.2

Net returns

T1

12

88888

7813.6

3.2594*

0.0452

T2

12

99440

14613.7

T3

12

98691

12726.1

 

Table 4. Effect of zinc sulphate application on soil zinc status:

S.No.

Village

Farmer

Zinc (ppm)

 

2019-20

2020-21

Initial

Treatment

Control

Control

Residual

Zinc

1

Gayamvaripalli

G Sreenivasulu Reddy

0.488

0.563

0.408

0.723

0.898

1.531

2

Gayamvaripalli

Kodatham Bhaskar

0.932

0.968

0.530

0.718

0.845

0.88

3

Gayamvaripalli

PadigalaRajendraiah

0.461

1.179

0.393

1.861

0.793

2.593

4

Yellampalli

Y Raghunath Reddy

0.756

1.991

0.689

1.082

1.674

2.037

5

Yellampalli

L Mahindra Reddy

0.569

0.928

0.492

0.839

0.848

1.257

6

Yellampalli

L Malleswari

0.707

0.813

0.561

0.541

0.982

1.252

7

Palem

B Chinnappa

1.197

1.729

0.902

0.839

0.922

1.171

8

Palem

M Ramana

0.683

0.687

0.675

0.709

0.655

0.722

9

Palem

B Krishnaiah

1.280

1.909

0.718

0.709

0.938

0.962

10

Dasireddygaripalli

K Reddappa Reddy

0.962

1.097

0.513

0.632

0.736

1.265

11

Dasireddygaripalli

K Anna Reddy

0.903

0.981

0.767

0.812

0.914

0.918

12

Dasireddygaripalli

P Shankar Reddy

0.766

1.132

0.675

0.707

0.931

1.409

Average

0.809

1.165

0.610

0.848

0.928

1.333

 

Conclusion


The study demonstrates that zinc sulphate application significantly enhances paddy yield, economic returns, and soil zinc status, with continuous application offering the highest benefits. Zinc-treated plots consistently outperformed control plots regarding grain yield and profitability across two consecutive Kharif seasons. The residual effects of zinc application further underline its potential for sustainable nutrient management. Additionally, improved soil zinc levels highlight the role of zinc in maintaining soil fertility, ensuring long-term productivity. These findings advocate for integrating zinc fertilization into paddy cultivation practices, particularly in zinc-deficient soils, to optimize yield, improve farmer incomes, and support sustainable agriculture. Future studies could explore the optimization of zinc application rates and methods to enhance its efficiency and minimize environmental impacts.

References


Alloway, B. J. (2008). Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. International Zinc Association and International Fertilizer Industry Association, Brussels.

Cakmak, I. (2008). Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant and Soil, 302(1–2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3Prasad, R., Shivay, Y. S., & Kumar, D. (2012). Agronomic biofortification of cereal grains with iron and zinc. Advances in Agronomy, 116, 55–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800137-0.00002-9

Shivay, Y. S., Kumar, D., & Prasad, R. (2010). Zinc-enriched urea improves grain yield and quality of rice. Better Crops, 94(2), 26–28.

Cite This Article


APA Style

Sahaja Deva, M., Mallikarjun, M., Prasanna Lakshmi Ravuri, P., Ganesh Kumar Perneti, G., Reddi Kumar, M., & Jyosthna, M. K. (2025). Influence of zinc application on yield, economics, and soil zinc status in paddy. Madras Agricultural Journal, 112(10–12), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.901207

ACS Style

Sahaja Deva; Mallikarjun, M.; Ravuri, P. L.; Perneti, G. K.; Reddi Kumar, M.; Jyosthna, M. K. Influence of Zinc Application on Yield, Economics, and Soil Zinc Status in Paddy. Madras Agric. J. 2025, 112 (10–12), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.901207

AMA Style

Sahaja Deva M, Mallikarjun M, Ravuri PL, Perneti GK, Reddi Kumar M, Jyosthna MK. Influence of zinc application on yield, economics, and soil zinc status in paddy. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2025;112(10–12):104-109. doi:10.29321/MAJ.10.901207

Author Information


<p>Sahaja Deva</p>


No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

footer

Copyright © Madras Agricultural Journal | Masu Journal All rights reserved.