The results of the analysis of variance for the M2 generation of rabi sorghum are furnished in Table 1. Highly significant differences among the genotypes were observed for fourteen characters, indicating the presence of sufficient variability among genotypes for these fourteen characters.
For all fourteen of the traits under consideration, the mean sums of squares due to progenies within families were found to be highly significant, demonstrating that progenies within the family differ from one another. Anand and Kajjidoni (2014), Htun et al. (2015), Kham et al. (2015), Suthakar and Mullainathan (2015), and Takele et al. (2021) have all observed such variation yield and yield-attributing traits. The outcome of the variability parameters is shown in Table 2. For each of the fourteen characters in the M2 generation of sorghum, the genetic components; genotypic variance, phenotypic variance, genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV), heritability (in broad sense), genetic advance (GA) and genetic advance as the percent of mean (GAM) were calculated using the proper statistical formulas. The results are presented in Table 2.
(PCV) was found to be higher than the genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for all the characters with extremely minor differences, indicating a substantial genetic influence. Anand and Kajiidoni (2014), Kham et al. (2015), Shivaprashad et al. (2019), Htun et al. (2015), and Thange et al. (2021) agreed with these findings. GCV and PCV values for grain yield per plant were moderate (15.97% and 18.19%, respectively), indicating moderate variability across progenies for this character and a greater possibility for improving this character by selection in the appropriate direction. Additionally, the progeny exhibited moderate GCV and PCV values for 100-seed weight (8.36% and 13.25%) and flag leaf area (6.08% and 10.38%). The other variables such as days to 50% flowering (1.32% and 1.99%), plant height (3.24% and 3.86%), days to maturity (0.47% and 1.11%), number of primaries per panicle (2.15% and 3.23%), number of grains per primary (2.00% and 2.49%), panicle length (cm) (1.66% and 2.63%), panicle width (g) (2.62% and 3.96%), fodder yield per plant (g) (6.15% and 9.17%), Relative water content (%) (2.53% and 4.96%), Chlorophyll content (SPAD values) (7.40% and 9.11%) and Leaf area (cm2) (3.60% and 5.13%). These characters had low GCV and PCV levels. Low PCV values, accompanied by marginally low GCV values in these traits, suggested a limited level of variability in the materials and a low likelihood of genetic improvement. This suggests that the level of variability and the odds of genetic improvement are moderate. Similar results were found for grain yield per plant by Patel et al., (1980b), Kumar and Singh (1986), Cheralu and Rao (1989) for days to flowering and days to maturity by Nimbalkar et al. (1988), Narkhede et al, (2001); for plant height by Patel et al. (1980a), Patel et al., (1980b), Singh et al., (1980), Amrithadevarathinam et al. (1994) for panicle length and chlorophyll content (spad values) by Narkhede et al, (2001); for 100 grain weight by Negash et al., (2005); for relative water content by Pawar (2007).
High heritability was observed for grain yield per plant (77.05%), plant height (70.53%), number of grains per primary (64.49%), and chlorophyll content (SPAD values) (66.00%). Additionally, the progeny showed moderate heritability for days to 50% flowering (44.12%), number of primaries per panicle (44.38%), panicle length (39.67%), panicle weight (43.62%), 100 grain weight (39.84%), fodder yield per plant (44.98%), leaf area (49.15%) and flag leaf area (34.28%). This suggests that the genotypic effect of phenotypes may be well measured and that selection may be effectively used to enhance these traits. These results are consistent with the results reported by Khaing Wah Htum et al., (2015). Anand and Kajidoni (2014).
The characters viz., plant height (9.99%), leaf area (28.83%), flag leaf area (21.08%), and grain yield per plant (15.73%), all showed moderate genetic advance. Supporting results were observed by Khaing Wah Htum et al., (2015). Anand and Kajidoni (2014). The traits with low estimates of genetic advance were days to 50% flowering (1.16%), days to maturity (0.48%), number of primaries per panicle (1.54%), number of grains per primary (3.47%), panicle length (cm) (0.48%), panicle width (g) (0.26%), 100 grain weight (g) (0.25%), fodder yield per plant (g) (3.92%), Relative water content (%) (1.26%) and Chlorophyll content (SPAD values) (6.28%). Shivaprashad et al. (2019) discovered similar results for these traits.
In predicting selection response, heritability combined with genetic advance is more valuable than heritability alone. Plant height, grain yield per plant, number of grains per primary and leaf area all these traits showed high heritability and moderate genetic advance, which indicates the role of additive gene effects and least the effects of environmental factors on the expression of the traits. Thus, simple phenotypic selection offers a greater potential for improving these traits. Muduli and Misra (2008), Anand and Kajjidoni (2014), Shivaprashad et al. (2019), all found comparable results for these traits.
High heritability coupled with low genetic advance was observed for the number of grains per primary and chlorophyll content (SPAD values), indicating non-additive gene action. So, these traits cannot be improved through simple selection. Similar results were also observed by Shivaprashad et al. (2019).
Table 1: Analysis of variance for yield and yield contributing characters in rabi sorghum
Source of Variation
|
df
|
DFF
|
PH (cm)
|
DM
|
NPPP
|
NGPP
|
PL (cm)
|
PW (cm)
|
Treatments
|
6
|
3.05*
|
114.07**
|
2.19*
|
5.33*
|
15.56**
|
0.62*
|
0.16*
|
Replication
|
2
|
0.90
|
9.22
|
0.14
|
3.57
|
8.19
|
0.24
|
0.17
|
Error
|
12
|
0.90
|
13.95
|
1.31
|
1.57
|
2.41
|
0.21
|
0.05
|
Source of Variation
|
df
|
100 SW (g)
|
FYPP (g)
|
RWC (%)
|
CC (spad values)
|
LA (cm2)
|
FLA (cm2)
|
GYPP (g)
|
Treatments
|
6
|
0.16*
|
33.99*
|
8.38*
|
49.50**
|
1668.02**
|
1501.3**
|
249.54**
|
Replication
|
2
|
0.14
|
30.46
|
2.27
|
24.99
|
668.9
|
286.2
|
27.98
|
Error
|
12
|
0.05
|
9.84
|
4.08
|
7.25
|
412.3
|
585.3
|
22.54
|
* and ** Significant at 5 % and 1% level of significance, respectively.
DFF= Days to 50% Flowering, PH= Plant Hight, DM= Days to Maturity, NPPP= Number of Primaries Per Panicle, NGPP= Number of Grains Per Primary, PL= Panicle Length PW= Panicle Width, 100 SW= 100 Seed Weight, FYPP= Fodder Yield Per Plant, RWC= Relative Water Content, CC= Chlorophyll Content, LA= Leaf Area, FLA= Flag Leaf Area, and GYPP= Grain Yield Per Plant.
Table 2: Genetic variability parameters for yield and yield contributing characters in M2 generation of rabi sorghum.
Sr. No.
|
Characters
|
Mean
|
G V (%)
|
P V (%)
|
GCV (%)
|
PCV (%)
|
H2bs
(%)
|
GA (%)
|
GAM (%)
|
1
|
Days to 50% Flowering
|
64
|
0.71
|
1.62
|
1.32
|
1.99
|
44.12
|
1.16
|
1.81
|
2
|
plant height (cm)
|
178.3
|
33.37
|
47.32
|
3.24
|
3.86
|
70.53
|
9.99
|
5.61
|
3
|
Days to maturity
|
114
|
0.29
|
1.60
|
0.47
|
1.11
|
18.32
|
0.48
|
0.42
|
4
|
Number of primaries per panicle
|
52
|
1.25
|
2.83
|
2.15
|
3.23
|
44.38
|
1.54
|
2.96
|
5
|
Number of grains per primary
|
105
|
4.38
|
6.79
|
2.00
|
2.49
|
64.49
|
3.47
|
3.31
|
6
|
Panicle length [cm]
|
22.3
|
0.14
|
0.34
|
1.66
|
2.63
|
39.67
|
0.48
|
2.15
|
7
|
Panicle width [cm]
|
7.3
|
0.04
|
0.08
|
2.62
|
3.96
|
43.62
|
0.26
|
3.56
|
8
|
100 seed wight[g]
|
2.3
|
0.04
|
0.09
|
8.36
|
13.25
|
39.84
|
0.25
|
10.87
|
9
|
Fodder yield per plant[g]
|
46.1
|
8.05
|
17.89
|
6.15
|
9.17
|
44.98
|
3.92
|
8.50
|
10
|
Relative water content [%]
|
47.4
|
1.43
|
5.51
|
2.53
|
4.96
|
26.02
|
1.26
|
2.66
|
11
|
Chlorophyll content [spad values]
|
50.7
|
14.08
|
21.34
|
7.40
|
9.11
|
66.00
|
6.28
|
12.39
|
12
|
Leaf area [cm2]
|
555.3
|
398.61
|
810.93
|
3.60
|
5.13
|
49.15
|
28.83
|
5.19
|
13
|
Flag leaf area[cm2]
|
287.6
|
305.34
|
890.64
|
6.08
|
10.38
|
34.28
|
21.08
|
7.33
|
14
|
Grain yield per plant[g]
|
54.5
|
75.67
|
98.21
|
15.97
|
18.19
|
77.05
|
15.73
|
28.87
|
GV = Genotypic variance (σ2 g) (%), GCV = Genotypic coefficient of variation (%) PV = phenotypic variance (σ2 p) (%), PCV = Phenotypic coefficient of variation (%) h2 bs = Heritability (Broad sense) (%), GAM = Genetic Advance as per cent of mean (%)