Madras Agricultural Journal
Loading.. Please wait

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

Research Article | Open Access | Peer Review

Preliminary Studies on the use of Botanical Extracts as An Eco-Friendly Approach to Manage Pests of Rice in Karaikal, U.T. of Puducherry

Kandibane Muthusamy ORCID iD , Nishanthini K ORCID iD
Volume : 112
Issue: June(4-6)
Pages: 91 - 100
Download

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No figure image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

No table image available.

Abstract


Field experiments were conducted at the Eastern farm of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute (PAJANCOA and RI), Karaikal, during Rabi 2019-2020 to study the effect of botanical extracts against the major pests of rice. Gall midge (Orseolia oryzae), it was found that Significant differences (P < 0.01) were recorded, the overall mean silver shoot damage was low in thiamethoxam 25 WG at 40 g / ac (4.94 %) with a percent reduction of 31.52 %, and among the botanical treatments, garlic and chilli extract at 5 % recorded the lower damage of 5.63 % with a percent reduction of 21.95 %. Case worm (Parapoynx stagnalis) mean leaf damage was low in novaluron 10 EC at 400 ml/ac with a percent reduction of 50.36%. Garlic and chilli extract recorded the lower damage of 4.85% with a percent reduction of 41.99%. The green leafhopper (Nephotettix virescens) and brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) populations were low in thiamethoxam 25 WG at 40 g/ac with a percent reduction of 59.34 and 68.72 % followed by five leaf extract, with a reduction of 44.04 and 50.19 % compared to the untreated check.

DOI
Pages
91 - 100
Creative Commons
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Madras Agricultural Students' Union in Madras Agricultural Journal (MAJ). This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited by the user.

Keywords


Rice Leaf extracts Gall midge Case worm Leaf hoppers Garlic and Chilli extract Five leaf extract

Introduction


One of the most significant crops in the world, rice (Oryza sativa L.), is a staple food for nearly half of the world's population (FAO, 2004) and for 2.7 billion people in developing Asian nations. With a yield of 483 million tons, rice is grown on around 148 million hectares of land worldwide, with Asia accounting for nearly 90% of the total area. Approximately one-fifth of the world's cropland used for cereal production is dedicated to rice cultivation.

 

Rice is highly susceptible to a variety of abiotic and biotic stresses which significantly affect its yield and quality. Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, heat, and flooding adversely impact rice growth, development, and grain productivity. Drought stress reduces photosynthesis and disrupts metabolic functions, while salinity leads to ion toxicity and osmotic imbalance, causing reduced seed germination and stunted growth (Munns and Tester, 2008). High temperatures during the reproductive stage lead to pollen sterility, poor grain filling, and yield loss (Jadadish et al., 2010), while submergence stress affects root respiration and nutrient uptake. Biotic stresses, on the other hand, include attacks by insect pests and diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, and viruses (Horgan et al., 2021). More than 300 insect pests are known to devastate rice fields in the tropics. Still, the majority of them do not cause sufficient economic harm to necessitate management measures, as the rice plants' robust compensatory mechanisms enable them to recover from such damage while in the vegetative stage. Nonetheless, particular insect pest species can destroy crops, and they often impact output and jeopardize food security when they are present in significant quantities.

 

One of the most significant pests that can cause significant damage in Puducherry in general and in the state's endemic areas in particular is the gall midge (Orseolia oryzae Wood-Mason) and it was noted as a regular pest in the Cauvery Delta region where rice is grown as the main crop during the kharif and rabi seasons each year. The rice gall midge maggots are producing galls in the rice's central leaf sheath, which leads to the development of silver shoots that are subsequently unable to produce panicles. In favourable agroclimatic conditions, the pest may reduce yield in the state of Puducherry by 10–25%. The rice case worm (Parapoynx stagnalis Zeller) utilizes its gills to breathe and is in its complete aquatic larval stage. It uses oxygen that has been dissolved in a drop of water that it carries in the rice-leaf casing to breathe. Rice in the seedling stage is susceptible to pest attacks, and this susceptability is more prevalent in fields with standing water (Nilamudeen et al., 2024). It creates cases and cuts rice leaves at a sharp right angle, which leads to a reduction in photosynthetic area, and accordingly, a reduction in yield. The primary sucking pests that cause significant financial losses in rice are hoppers, including the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.), and the green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant). This insect's nymphs and adults both drain the plant's sap, which causes the rice plant to become chlorotic, wilt, and dry out. This feeding damage is often known as ‘hopper burn’, and up to 60% yield loss is common in sensitive rice cultivars attacked by the brown plant hopper. N. lugens also transmits the grassy stunt disease (Prasannakumar et al., 2015).

 

Chemical pest control, primarily through the use of synthetic insecticides, is a common practice in rice cultivation to mitigate pest infestations and ensure higher yields. Insecticides such as organophosphates (e.g., chlorpyrifos), carbamates, and pyrethroids are widely applied to control key pests, including rice stem borers, brown planthoppers, and leaf folders. Although these chemicals provide immediate pest suppression, their indiscriminate and prolonged use often leads to pesticide resistance, resurgence of secondary pests and environmental pollution. Moreover, residues of these chemicals accumulate in soil and water, posing severe health hazards to humans and non-target organisms. Chronic exposure to pesticide residues in rice has been linked to adverse health effects including neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and endocrine disruption in humans (Aktar et al., 2009). Organochlorine compounds, though banned in many countries, persist in the environment and bioaccumulate in the food chain, posing long-term health risks (Singh et al., 2018; Rajashekhar et al., 2021). Additionally, pesticide runoff contaminates water bodies, leading to the destruction of aquatic ecosystems and the loss of biodiversity. To mitigate these consequences, promoting botanical insecticides and reducing reliance on chemical pesticides is essential for ensuring sustainable rice production and safeguarding human health and the environment.

 

Insecticide use can have adverse effects on the ecosystem, eliminate beneficial insects, and leave residues in harvested produce. Botanical insecticides have long been marketed as appealing substitutes for synthetic chemical insecticides in pest management (Isman, 2006). Given the significance of environmentally friendly methods for managing pests, the experiment was designed to ascertain the effect of botanical extracts against the main pests of rice. Plant-based insecticides derived from a combination of five leaf extracts Azadirachta indica (neem), Vitex negundo (Indian privet), Lantana camara (lantana), Annona squamosa (custard apple), and Clerodendrum inerme (wild jasmine) have shown promising results in controlling major rice pests such as the rice stem borer, rice leaf folder and brown planthopper. These extracts possess a variety of bioactive compounds, including alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids, which exhibit insecticidal, antifeedant, and growth-regulating effects on pests (SenthilNathan et al., 2006). The synergistic effect of these leaf extracts enhances pest control by disrupting the pest's physiological processes and reducing feeding and oviposition. Studies have demonstrated that foliar applications of these extracts significantly reduce pest infestation and improve rice yield without harming to beneficial insects. Garlic (Allium sativum) and chilli (Capsicum frutescens) extracts have demonstrated significant bioefficacy against major rice pests. Garlic extract, rich in organosulfur compounds such as allicin, exhibits insecticidal, antifeedant, and repellent properties that disrupt the metabolic activities of pests, leading to reduced feeding and growth inhibition (Dougoud et al., 2019). Similarly, chilli extract contains capsaicinoids, which exhibit neurotoxic and antifeedant effects, impairing pest behavior and reducing insect proliferation in rice fields (Baidoo and Mochiah, 2016). The combined application of garlic and chilli extracts enhances their insecticidal properties through synergistic effects, resulting in higher pest mortality and decreased pest infestation. Field trials have shown that foliar application of these extracts reduces pest incidence by up to 60%, improving overall rice yield and minimizing environmental contamination (Tuan et al., 2014).

 

Taking into account the significance of the efficacy of mixtures of plant extracts and eco-friendly approaches to pest management in the rice ecosystem, the goal of the current inquiry was to examine the effect of plant extracts on the key pest of rice.

Methodology


Field experiments

To study the effect of botanical extracts, a supervised field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2019-2020 as an irrigated crop in the eastern farm of PAJANCOA and RI, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, which lies between 10.95 N latitude and 79.78 E longitude with a height of 4 m above MSL. The climate at the study site during May is very hot due to intense solar radiation. The daytime temperature reaches approximately 40°C and nighttime temperatures are above 30 °C. The study area receives heavy rainfall only during the northeast monsoon (Debaje et al., 2003). January is the representative of the winter season. Fair weather prevails with wind speed in the order of 3-4 m/s and a northeasterly direction, accompanied by a clear sky and moderate relative humidity exists during the winter season (January-February). The month of July marks the beginning of the pre-monsoon season. Partly cloudy skies and hot weather, with no rain, characterize the pre-monsoon season (June-September) (Debaje and Johnson, 2011).

The experiment was set up in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments, each repeated three times and the rice variety used was ADT 45. The main field of 500 m2 was divided into 5 x 4 m2 plot size and outer area, a total of 24 plot. Rice seedlings were transplanted with row x plant spacing of 15 x 10 cm with recommended agronomic procedures being followed except plant protection measures. Each plot contains 1333 plants of which 10 plants were randomly selected and observed for insect damage symptoms at weekly intervals from 7 DAT, when pest incidence reached the Economic Threshold (ETL), the treatments were imposed. Three foliar applications were made 24, 39 and 54 days after transplanting in experiment. Pre-treatment observations were recorded one day before application of treatment, and post-treatment observations were taken at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 days after treatment (DAT). The treatments of the experiment are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Treatments of the experiment

Treatment No.

Treatments

Conc.

%/ml/g

per acre

T1

Five-leaf extract

10

T2

Garlic and chilli extract

5

T3

Bitter apple leaf extract

10

T4

Ponneem 45 %

1500

T5

Azadirachtin 0.03 %

800

T6

Thiamethoxam 25 WG

40

T7

Novaluron 10 EC

400

T8

Untreated check

-

Preparation of the botanical extracts

Five leaf extracts were prepared by using plant materials viz. giant milkweed (Calotropis gigantea Linnaeus), leaves of neem (Azadirachta indica), jatropha (Jatropha curcas Linnaeus), five-leaved chaste (Vitex negundo) and adhathoda (Justicia adhatoda Linnaeus) which were collected from the local area of Karaikal district, U.T. of Puducherry, India. About 2 kg of fresh leaves from each plant were taken, washed with tap water and diced into small pieces. The diced pieces of leaves were macerated individually with an electric blender into paste was added to 12–15 litres of cow urine (add additional if needed to submerge the plant material in the urine thoroughly), followed by the addition of 3-5 kg of cow dung and, if available, 100–250 gms of turmeric powder. The mixture was then left to ferment for 7–15 days. Leaves were fermented and the solution was filtered using double layered muslin cloth. The filtrate was then sprayed on the rice crop in the trial.

The outer layers of developed garlic were peeled off, and mature green chilli was removed to make garlic and chilli extract. To make juice, 200 g of each was combined with 1 L of water and ground using an electric blender. One litre of water was used to blend this juice completely. The mixture was then sieved to get a turbidity-free, homogeneous extract (Tuan et al., 2014).

Bitter apple leaves, Citrullus colocynthis Schrad, were picked locally and rinsed with running tap water to eliminate debris before being cut into small pieces using a sharp knife. In a mixer grinder, 500 g of leaves were mixed into a fine paste with 500 ml of water.

Data collection

Gall midge, O. oryzae

The total number of tillers and gall midge damaged tillers from 10 randomly chosen hills per plot was used to assess gall midge damage. The formula was used to calculate the percentage of leaf damage.

Percent incidence =

Case worm, P. stagnalis

The total number of leaves and damaged leaves from 10 randomly chosen hills per plot were used to assess case worm leaf damage. The formula was used to calculate the percentage of leaf damage.

Percent incidence =

Assessment of green leafhopper – N. virescens, brown planthopper – N. lugens population

            Observation on the number of green leafhopper and brown planthoppers were recorded on ten randomly selected hills per plot.

Statistical Analysis

The percent data was translated into the equivalent angular transformation (arcsine) and population was translated into square root transformation. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SPSS version 22.0, IBM Corporation, New York, USA).  Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine the significant variation (P<0.05), and plot was made in Graphpad prism.

Results Discussion


The pest’s gall midge, case worm, green leafhopper, and brown planthopper had an outbreak during Rabi 2019 -2020, as the season had favourable environment conditions for their occurrence.

The efficacy of different botanicals was evaluated across three foliar spray applications to assess their impact on the incidence of silver-shoot in rice. The data, presented in Figure 1, show the percentage of silver-shoot incidence after the first, second and third foliar sprays. The results indicated that after the 1st foliar spray, no significant differences (NS) were observed among the treatments. The percentage of silver-shoot ranged between 1.0% and 2.5% across all treatments, including botanical extracts (five leaf extract, garlic and chilli extract, and bitter apple leaf extract), synthetic insecticides (Ponneem 45%, azadirachtin 0.03%, thiamethoxam 25 WG, and novaluron 10 EC), and the untreated control. Since no statistically significant differences were observed (P > 0.05), the initial spray had a minimal effect on silver-shoot incidence, indicating that a single spray may not be sufficient to effectively suppress the pest population. Significant differences (P < 0.01) were recorded after the 2nd foliar spray, where all treatments demonstrated a noticeable reduction in silver-shoot incidence compared to the untreated control. Among the botanical extracts, the garlic and chilli extracts showed a notable reduction, with a silver-shoot incidence of approximately 6.5%. Among the synthetic insecticides, thiamethoxam 25 WG recorded the lowest silver-shoot incidence (5.2%). A further reduction in silver-shoot incidence was observed after the 3rd foliar spray, with significant differences among treatments (P < 0.01). Garlic and chilli extract showed superior efficacy among botanical treatments, reducing silver-shoot incidence to 5.1%. Among the synthetic insecticides, thiamethoxam 25 WG recorded the lowest incidence (4.0%), followed closely by novaluron 10 EC (4.6%). The results indicated that thiamethoxam 25 WG at 40 g / ac was found to be superior among the treatments (31.52 % reduction), and garlic and chilli extract at 5 % (21.95 %) was superior among the botanicals compared to the untreated check (Table 2). The results clearly indicate that repeated foliar sprays significantly reduced silver-shoot incidence in treated plots compared to the untreated control. Synthetic insecticides, particularly thiamethoxam 25 WG and novaluron 10 EC, demonstrated the highest efficacy, followed by botanical extracts such as garlic and chilli extract. The five-leaf extract and bitter apple leaf extract also contributed to pest suppression but were relatively less effective. The present study aligns with several previous reports highlighting the efficacy of both chemical insecticides and botanical extracts in managing insect pests of rice. Among the chemical insecticides, Thiamethoxam 25 WG demonstrated significant efficacy in minimizing the percentage silver shoot and effectively controlling major rice pests, particularly the green leafhopper (Nephotettix virescens) and brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). These results are consistent with the thiamethoxam at 50 g a.i./ha significantly minimized silver shoot percentage and that a dose of 30 g a.i./ha was highly effective in controlling green leafhopper and brown planthopper populations. Similarly, Shashank et al., (2012) reported that buprofezin at 0.20 kg a.i./ha and thiamethoxam at 0.025 kg a.i./ha were highly effective in reducing the population of green leafhoppers, underscoring the role of neonicotinoid insecticides in managing rice pests.

Moreover, Novaluron 10 EC, an insect growth regulator (IGR), demonstrated strong efficacy in controlling leaf folder infestations, which concurs with the cartap hydrochloride 50 SP at 500 g a.i./ha showed maximum efficacy against rice leaf folder and was on par with novaluron 10 EC at 450 ml/ha. Novaluron’s mode of action, which disrupts chitin synthesis and interferes with the molting process of immature insects, resulted in substantial pest population reduction in the current study. This finding is also supported by Maxwell and Fadamiro, (2006), who demonstrated that infestations of imported cabbage worm (Pieris rapae), diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), and cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) were effectively managed by four applications of novaluron per season. Additionally, novaluron alone achieved 90% mortality of P. xylostella larvae, highlighting its effectiveness in pest control.

Garlic and chilli extract, in particular, exhibited remarkable pest control properties in the present study. Garlic-chilli kerosene (0.5%) and garlic-chilli aqueous (2%) formulations led to a 46.85% reduction in the larval population of the chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Moreover, garlic bulb extract, either alone or in combination with kerosene, chilli, neem oil, and other plant-based extracts, effectively controlled various lepidopteran borer pests such as Earias vittella and Chilo partellus. The bioactive compounds in garlic (allicin) and chilli (capsaicin) are known to exhibit insecticidal, repellent, and antifeedant properties, thereby interfering with the feeding, development, and reproduction of insect pests.

 

Fig 1. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts against the gall midge, O. oryzae in the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019-2020; NS – Non Significant; **- significant at 0.0%; Each bar war Observed on pretreatment, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days following treatment with common letter not substantially different by DMRT (P<0.05)

The effect of botanical extracts against the case worm on the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019-2020 (Fig. 2). After the 1st foliar spray, significant differences were observed among the treatments (P < 0.01), with leaf damage percentages ranging from approximately 8.5% to 13.5%. The botanical extracts, including garlic and chilli extract, five-leaf extract, and bitter apple leaf extract, resulted in moderate leaf damage, with values between 9.8% and 10.5%. Following the 2nd foliar spray, a substantial reduction in leaf damage was observed across all treatments (P < 0.01), with significant differences noted among them. The untreated control again recorded the highest leaf damage (12.5%), indicating that continued pest pressure was present. Novaluron 10 EC and thiamethoxam 25 WG demonstrated superior efficacy, reducing leaf damage to 4.2% and 4.8%, respectively. Garlic and chilli extract as well as Ponneem 45% exhibited moderate efficacy, with leaf damage levels of 5.3% and 5.7%, respectively. Bitter apple leaf extract and five leaf extract resulted in slightly higher leaf damage at 6.4% and 6.8%, respectively. Azadirachtin 0.03% resulted in 7.5% leaf damage, demonstrating moderate efficacy compared to synthetic insecticides. By the 3rd foliar spray, all treatments effectively reduced leaf damage to minimal levels, and no significant differences (NS) were observed between treatments. Leaf damage percentages ranged from 0.5% and 1.8%, indicating that successive sprays effectively controlled pest infestations. Novaluron 10 EC and thiamethoxam 25 WG exhibited the lowest leaf damage levels at 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. The botanical extracts, including garlic and chilli extract, five-leaf extract, and bitter apple leaf extract, resulted in minimal leaf damage ranging from 0.8% and 1.2%. The results indicated that novaluron 10 EC at 400 ml/ac was found to be superior among the treatments (50.36 % reduction) and garlic and chilli extract at 5 % (41.99 %) were superior among the botanicals compared to the untreated check (Table 2).

Fig 2. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts against the case worm, P. stagnalis in the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019- 2020; NS – Non Significant; **- significant at 0.0%; Each bar war Observed on pretreatment, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days following treatment with common letter not substantially different by DMRT (P<0.05)

 

The effect of botanical extracts against the green leafhopper and brown planthopper, on the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019-2020 (Figs 3 and 4). In green leafhopper, the number of insects per hill was significantly reduced after the 2nd and 3rd foliar sprays (p < 0.01) across treatments. During the 1st foliar spray, all treatments showed non-significant differences (NS) with similar insect numbers. After the 2nd and 3rd foliar sprays, thiamethoxam 25 WG and novaluron 10 EC resulted in the lowest insect count compared to other treatments. Among the botanical extracts, the five-leaf extract and garlic and chilli extract were more effective in reducing insect populations compared to others. Similar trends were observed, where the number of insects per hill was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) after the second and third foliar sprays for the brown planthopper. The results indicated that thiamethoxam 25 WG at 40 g/ac was found to be superior among the treatments (59.34% and 68.72% reduction) and five-leaf extract at 10% (44.04% and 50.19%) was superior among the botanicals compared to the untreated check (Table 2). Current findings are in accordance with this. In terms of botanical insecticides, five-leaf extract, garlic and chilli extracts have demonstrated moderate efficacy against rice pests. The findings corroborate the results that extracts from Vitex, Pongamia, and Calotropis were effective against planthoppers. These findings were further supported by demonstrating that a 5% concentration of Vitex leaf extract exhibited significant efficacy against rice hoppers, suggesting that plant-based extracts can be viable alternatives to synthetic insecticides.

 

Fig 3. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts on the population of the green leafhopper, N. virescens in the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019-2020; NS – Non Significant; **- significant at 0.0%; Each bar war Observed on pretreatment, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days following treatment with common letter not substantially different by DMRT (P<0.05)

Fig 4. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts on the population of the brown planthopper, N. lugens in the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019-2020; **- significant at 0.0%; Each bar war Observed on pretreatment, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days following treatment with common letter not substantially different by DMRT (P<0.05)

 

Table 2. Bioefficacy of botanical extracts against the crucial pests in the rice variety ADT 45 during Rabi 2019- 2020

 

 

Sl.
No.

 

 

Treatments

 

Conc.

%/ml/g

per acre

O. oryzae

P. stagnalis

N. virescens

N. lugens

Mean of Three Spraying

Percent reduction over control

Mean of 3 Spraying

Percent reduction over control

Mean of 3 Spraying

Percent reduction over control

Mean of 3 Spraying

Percent reduction over control

1.

Five-leaf extract

10

6.11

15.30

5.10

39.00

3.60

47.17

3.45

50.19

2.

 

Garlic and chilli extract

5

5.63

21.95

4.85

41.99

3.82

44.04

3.78

45.43

3.

Bitter apple leaf extract

10

6.69

7.26

5.99

28.41

6.15

9.87

6.22

10.15

4.

Ponneem 45 %

1500

5.99

16.96

5.31

36.57

3.92

42.52

4.20

39.36

5.

Azadirachtin 0.03 %

800

6.45

10.54

5.54

33.78

4.11

39.78

4.49

35.23

6.

Thiamethoxam 25 WG

40

4.94

31.52

4.43

47.01

2.77

59.34

2.17

68.72

7.

Novaluron 10 EC

400

5.05

29.94

4.15

50.36

5.61

17.79

5.58

19.44

8.

Untreated check

-

7.21

-

8.37

-

6.82

-

6.93

-

 

 

 

Conclusion


It was concluded that a 5% extract of garlic and chilli, and a 10% five-leaf extract might effectively lessen the adverse effects of the key pest in the rice crop. Secondary metabolites of garlic and chilli extracts, as well as five leaf extracts, show that botanical mixtures are responsible for reducing the feeding of leaf folder larvae on the treated leaf surface of rice plants. Even though the results strongly suggest using all the studied plant extracts, particularly those from garlic and chillies, much research still needs to be done to determine the optimal dosage and concentration. The effective dosage and spraying schedules for plant material are to be determined; further testing is also required in the future.

Author contributions: M.K. conceived the idea and K.N. conducted the experiment and analyzed the observations. K.N. and M.K. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.K. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

References


Aktar, W., Sengupta, D., and Chowdhury, A. 2009. Impact of pesticide use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 2(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7

Alam, S. N., Sarder, R., and Begum, S. 2019. Effect of plant-based bio-pesticides (Vitex, Pongamia, and Calotropis) on rice planthoppers. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(3): 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1627993

Baidoo, P. K., and Mochiah, M. B. (2016. Comparing the effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum L.) and hot pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) in the management of the major pests of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). Sustainable Agriculture Research, 5(2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v5n2p83

Debaje, S. B., and Johnson, J. S. 2011. High ozone at coastal sites in India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(4): 993–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160050212040

Debaje, S. B., Johnson Jeyakumar, S., Ganesan, K., Jadhav, D. B., and Seetaramayya, P. 2003. Surface ozone measurements at tropical rural coastal station Tranquebar, India. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 4911–4916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.07.001

Dougoud, J., Toepfer, S., Bateman, M., and Jenner, W. H. 2019. Efficacy of homemade botanical insecticides based on traditional knowledge: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(37): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0590-0

FAO. 2004. The state of food security in the world. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00235.x

Horgan, F. G., Srinivasan, T. S., Naik, B. S., and Bernal, C. C. 2021. Integrating resistance and resilience in rice pest management: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Field Crops Research, 260: 107986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107986

Isman, M. B. 2006. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 51: 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.102607

Jagadish, S. V. K., Craufurd, P. Q., and Wheeler, T. R. 2010. High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(1): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp289

Kushram, T., Yadu, Y. K., Sahu, M. K., Kulmitra, A. K., and Kumar, R. 2017. Bioefficacy of botanical insecticides against defoliator pests on soybean. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(3): 2196–2204. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.250

Maxwell, E. M., and Fadamiro, H. Y. 2006. Evaluation of several reduced-risk insecticides in combination with an action threshold for managing lepidopteran pests of cole crops in Alabama. Florida Entomologist, 89(2): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2006)89

Munns, R., and Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

Nilamudeen, M. K., Karthikeyan, K., Raji, P., and Arshad, M. V. 2024. Evaluation of botanicals against rice caseworm Parapoynx stagnalis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Agricultural Ecology and Research International, 25(3): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.9734/jaer/2024/v25i3713

Prasannakumar, N. R., Chander, S., and Vijaykumar, L. 2015. Development of weather-based rice yellow stem borer prediction model for the Cauvery command rice areas, Karnataka, India. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 1: 995281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.995281

Rajashekhar, M., Rajashekar, B., Reddy, T. P., Ramakrishna, K., Kumar, V. P., Vanisree, K., Neelima, G., Madhuri, G., and Shaila, O. P. 2021. Microbial pesticides for insect pest management success and risk analysis. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 11(4): 18–32. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i430386

SenthilNathan, S., Chung, P. G., and Murugan, K. 2006. Effect of botanical insecticides and bacterial toxins on the gut enzyme of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica, 32(5): 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981085

Shashank, P. R., Mallikarjuna, J., Chalam, M. S. V., and Madhumathi, T. 2012. Efficacy of new insecticide molecules against leafhoppers and planthoppers in rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Plant Protection, 5(2): 397–400. http://www.hindagrihorticulturalsociety.co.in/ijpp.html

Singh, N., Kumar, D., and Ravichandran, S. 2018. Pesticide residues and human health: Risk analysis in rice cultivation. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 53(6): 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2018.1461966

Tuan, N. M., Anh, B. L., and Anh, B. N. H. 2014. Efficacy of garlic and chili combination solution on cabbage insect pests and crop growth in Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 8(10): 1146–1149. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096944

Zhang, Z., Li, Y., and Zhou, W. 2020. Suppressive effects of garlic and chilli extracts on rice pest populations and plant health improvement. Crop Protection, 130: 105063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105063

Author Information


Kandibane Muthusamy

footer

© Madras Agricultural Journal. Website design – All rights reserved.